Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35159116›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Functional Therapeutic Target Validation Using Pediatric Zebrafish Xenograft Models.

Charlotte Gatzweiler, Johannes Ridinger, Sonja Herter, Xenia F Gerloff, Dina ElHarouni, Yannick Berker, Roland Imle, Lukas Schmitt, Sina Kreth, Sabine Stainczyk and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Organoids: A New Chapter in Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. One Host-Multiple Applications: Zebrafish (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Zebrafish Models of Paediatric Brain Tumours.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Charlotte GatzweilerHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Johannes RidingerHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Sonja HerterHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Xenia F GerloffHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Dina ElHarouniHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Yannick BerkerHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6707-0834
Roland ImleHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9564-6952
Lukas SchmittHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Sina KrethHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Sabine StainczykHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3746-7010
Simay AyhanHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0401-2442
Sara NajafiHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Damir KrunicLight Microscopy Facility, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Karen FreseInstitute for Cardiomyopathies Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Benjamin MederInstitute for Cardiomyopathies Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
David ReussDepartment Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Petra FieselHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Kathrin SchrammHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Mirjam Blattner-JohnsonHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
David T W JonesHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ana BanitoHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Frank WestermannHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Sina OppermannHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Till MildeHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Heike PeterzielHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Olaf WittHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ina OehmeHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0827-2356

Funding

The Ministry of Rural Affairs and Consumer Protection Baden-Wuerttemberg 4781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The survival rate among children with relapsed tumors remains poor, due to tumor heterogeneity, lack of directly actionable tumor drivers and multidrug resistance. Novel personalized medicine approaches tailored to each tumor are urgently needed to improve cancer treatment. Current pediatric precision oncology platforms, such as the INFORM (INdividualized Therapy FOr Relapsed Malignancies in Childhood) study, reveal that molecular profiling of tumor tissue identifies targets associated with clinical benefit in a subgroup of patients only and should be complemented with functional drug testing. In such an approach, patient-derived tumor cells are exposed to a library of approved oncological drugs in a physiological setting, e.g., in the form of animal avatars injected with patient tumor cells. We used molecularly fully characterized tumor samples from the INFORM study to compare drug screen results of individual patient-derived cell models in functional assays: (i) patient-derived spheroid cultures within a few days after tumor dissociation; (ii) tumor cells reisolated from the corresponding mouse PDX; (iii) corresponding long-term organoid-like cultures and (iv) drug evaluation with the corresponding zebrafish PDX (zPDX) model. Each model had its advantage and complemented the others for drug hit and drug combination selection. Our results provide evidence that in vivo zPDX drug screening is a promising add-on to current functional drug screening in precision medicine platforms.

Indexed as

drug screenfunctional precision oncologymPDXpatient-derived spheroid culturesmall molecule inhibitorstargeted therapyzPDX

Identifiers

PMID35159116
PMCPMC8834194

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.