Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35159279›Full record

ReviewCells2022

Generating Membrane Curvature at the Nuclear Pore: A Lipid Point of View.

Bas W A Peeters, Alexandra C A Piët, Maarten Fornerod

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Parkinson disease is a fatty acidopathy.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bas W A PeetersDepartment of Cell Biology, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexandra C A PiëtDepartment of Cell Biology, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten FornerodDepartment of Cell Biology, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development 91217045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to its structural role in enclosing and protecting the genome, the nuclear envelope (NE) forms a highly adaptive communication interface between the cytoplasm and the nuclear interior in eukaryotic cells. The double membrane of the NE is perforated by nuclear pores lined with large multi-protein structures, called nuclear-pore complexes (NPCs), which selectively allow the bi-directional transport of ions and macromolecular cargo. In order to nucleate a pore, the inner and outer nuclear membrane have to fuse at the site of NPC insertion, a process requiring both lipid bilayers to be deformed into highly curved structures. How this curvature is achieved and which factors are involved in inducing and stabilizing membrane curvature at the nuclear pore remain largely unclear. In this review, we will summarize the molecular mechanisms thought to be involved in membrane curvature generation, with a particular emphasis on the role of lipids and lipid metabolism in shaping the nuclear pore membrane.

Indexed as

Nuclear PoreNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsEukaryotic CellsLipid BilayersNuclear EnvelopeLipid BilayersNuclear Pore Complex Proteinslipidsmembrane curvaturenuclear envelopenuclear pore complexSMPD4

Identifiers

PMID35159279
PMCPMC8834089
OpenAlexW4210539586

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.