Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35162153›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

A Novel Integration of IF-DEMATEL and TOPSIS for the Classifier Selection Problem in Assistive Technology Adoption for People with Dementia.

Miguel Angel Ortíz-Barrios, Matias Garcia-Constantino, Chris Nugent, Isaac Alfaro-Sarmiento

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Fuzzy Hybrid MCDM Approach for Assessing the Emergency Department Performance during the COVID-19 Outbreak.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miguel Angel Ortíz-BarriosDepartment of Productivity and Innovation, Universidad de la Costa CUC, Barranquilla 081001, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-6890-7547
Matias Garcia-ConstantinoSchool of Computing and Mathematics, Ulster University, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3420-0532
Chris NugentSchool of Computing and Mathematics, Ulster University, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0882-7902
Isaac Alfaro-SarmientoDepartment of Productivity and Innovation, Universidad de la Costa CUC, Barranquilla 081001, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classifier selection problem in Assistive Technology Adoption refers to selecting the classification algorithms that have the best performance in predicting the adoption of technology, and is often addressed through measuring different single performance indicators. Satisfactory classifier selection can help in reducing time and costs involved in the technology adoption process. As there are multiple criteria from different domains and several candidate classification algorithms, the classifier selection process is now a problem that can be addressed using Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods. This paper proposes a novel approach to address the classifier selection problem by integrating Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (IFS), Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The step-by-step procedure behind this application is as follows. First, IF-DEMATEL was used for estimating the criteria and sub-criteria weights considering uncertainty. This method was also employed to evaluate the interrelations among classifier selection criteria. Finally, a modified TOPSIS was applied to generate an overall suitability index per classifier so that the most effective ones can be selected. The proposed approach was validated using a real-world case study concerning the adoption of a mobile-based reminding solution by People with Dementia (PwD). The outputs allow public health managers to accurately identify whether PwD can adopt an assistive technology which results in (i) reduced cost overruns due to wrong classification, (ii) improved quality of life of adopters, and (iii) rapid deployment of intervention alternatives for non-adopters.

Indexed as

DementiaSelf-Help DevicesDecision MakingHumansQuality of LifeUncertaintyclassifierDecision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL)Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (IFS)multi-criteria decision making (MCDM)People with Dementia (PwD)public healthTechnique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)technology adoption

Identifiers

PMID35162153
PMCPMC8834594

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.