Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35162182›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Effect of Blood Flow Restriction on Functional, Physiological and Structural Variables of Muscle in Patients with Chronic Pathologies: A Systematic Review.

Álvaro Jesús Reina-Ruiz, Alejandro Galán-Mercant, Guadalupe Molina-Torres, Jose Antonio Merchán-Baeza, Rita Pilar Romero-Galisteo, Manuel González-Sánchez

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Álvaro Jesús Reina-RuizDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Málaga, Arquitecto Francisco Peñalosa, 3, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6708-8201
Alejandro Galán-MercantMOVE-IT Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Education, Sciences University of Cádiz, 11002 Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3581-0372
Guadalupe Molina-TorresDepartment of Nursing Science, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Faculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2261-5482
Jose Antonio Merchán-BaezaCentre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), Research Group on Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Science and Welfare, University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVIC-UCC), C. Sagrada Família, 7, 08500 Vic, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6893-952X
Rita Pilar Romero-GalisteoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Málaga, Arquitecto Francisco Peñalosa, 3, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4669-0679
Manuel González-SánchezDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Málaga, Arquitecto Francisco Peñalosa, 3, 29071 Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3993-5092

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main objective of this systematic review of the current literature is to analyze the changes that blood flow restriction (BFR) causes in subjects with neuro-musculoskeletal and/or systemic pathologies focusing on the following variables: strength, physiological changes, structural changes and cardiocirculatory variables. The search was carried out in seven databases, including randomized clinical trials in which therapeutic exercise was combined with the blood flow restriction tool in populations with musculoskeletal pathologies. Outcome variables are strength, structural changes, physiological changes and cardiocirculatory variables. Twenty studies were included in the present study. Although there is a lot of heterogeneity between the interventions and evaluation instruments, we observed how the restriction of blood flow presents significant differences in the vast majority of the variables analyzed. In addition, we observed how BFR can become a supplement that provides benefits when performed with low intensity, similar to those obtained through high-intensity muscular efforts. The application of the BFR technique can provide benefits in the short and medium term to increase strength, muscle thickness and cardiovascular endurance, even improving the physiological level of the cardiovascular system. In addition, BFR combined with low-load exercises also achieves benefits comparable to high-intensity exercises without the application of BFR, benefiting patients who are unable to lift high loads.

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingExerciseHumansMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthRegional Blood Flowblood flow restrictionchronic pathologiescontrolled tourniquetmusculoskeletal diseaseocclusion resistance training

Identifiers

PMID35162182
PMCPMC8835162

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.