Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35163661›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Genome-Wide Prediction of Transcription Start Sites in Conifers.

Eugeniya I Bondar, Maxim E Troukhan, Konstantin V Krutovsky, Tatiana V Tatarinova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Classification of Promoter Sequences from Human Genome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Plant Biology and Biotechnology: Focus on Genomics and Bioinformatics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Eugeniya I BondarLaboratory of Forest Genomics, Institute of Fundamental Biology and Biotechnology, Siberian Federal University, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3762-6974
Maxim E TroukhanPersephone Software LLC, Agoura Hills, CA 91301, USA.
Konstantin V KrutovskyLaboratory of Forest Genomics, Institute of Fundamental Biology and Biotechnology, Siberian Federal University, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8819-7084
Tatiana V TatarinovaDepartment of Genomics and Bioinformatics, Institute of Fundamental Biology and Biotechnology, Siberian Federal University, 660074 Krasnoyarsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1787-1112
Institute for Information Transmission Problems · RUKrasnoyarsk Scientific Center · RUVoronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies · RU

Funding

Government of the Russian Federation 14.Y26.31.0004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of promoters is an essential step in the genome annotation process, providing a framework for gene regulatory networks and their role in transcription regulation. Despite considerable advances in the high-throughput determination of transcription start sites (TSSs) and transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs), experimental methods are still time-consuming and expensive. Instead, several computational approaches have been developed to provide fast and reliable means for predicting the location of TSSs and regulatory motifs on a genome-wide scale. Numerous studies have been carried out on the regulatory elements of mammalian genomes, but plant promoters, especially in gymnosperms, have been left out of the limelight and, therefore, have been poorly investigated. The aim of this study was to enhance and expand the existing genome annotations using computational approaches for genome-wide prediction of TSSs in the four conifer species: loblolly pine, white spruce, Norway spruce, and Siberian larch. Our pipeline will be useful for TSS predictions in other genomes, especially for draft assemblies, where reliable TSS predictions are not usually available. We also explored some of the features of the nucleotide composition of the predicted promoters and compared the GC properties of conifer genes with model monocot and dicot plants. Here, we demonstrate that even incomplete genome assemblies and partial annotations can be a reliable starting point for TSS annotation. The results of the TSS prediction in four conifer species have been deposited in the Persephone genome browser, which allows smooth visualization and is optimized for large data sets. This work provides the initial basis for future experimental validation and the study of the regulatory regions to understand gene regulation in gymnosperms.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantTranscription Initiation SiteBase CompositionBinding SitesDNA, PlantExonsMolecular Sequence AnnotationNucleotide MotifsNucleotidesOpen Reading FramesPromoter Regions, GeneticTracheophytaTranscription FactorsDNA, PlantNucleotidesTranscription Factorsconifergymnospermspromoter predictionTATA-boxtranscription factor binding sitetranscription start site

Identifiers

PMID35163661
PMCPMC8836283
OpenAlexW4210440651

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.