Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Katherine GlaserDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, 4150 V St., PSSB 2400, Sacramento, CA 95817. Electronic address: kbglaser@ucdavis.edu.
Assiamira FerraraDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
Jenna L RitchieDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
Ai-Lin TsaiDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
Mara GreenbergRegional Perinatal Service Center, The Permanente Medical Group, Santa Clara, CA.
Charles P QuesenberryDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
Susan D BrownDepartment of Internal Medicine, Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA. Electronic address: sdmbrown@ucdavis.edu.
Kaiser Permanente · USColorado Permanente Medical Group · USUniversity of California, Davis · US
Funding
Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
Optimizing a scalable intervention to maximize guideline-recommended diabetes testing after GDM - Diversity SupplementR01DK122087 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BROWN, SUSAN DENISE, FERRARA, ASSIAMIRA · 2021 to 2025
Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedDiabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Blood GlucoseFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansMass ScreeningPostpartum PeriodPregnancyBlood Glucose
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.
Perspectives on postpartum diabetes screening among patients with gestational diabetes in an integrated healthcare system. · full record | Socratic