ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2022
Repeatability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and agreement with other three optical biometers.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison meta-analysis of two swept-source optical coherence biometers.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Repeatability of Corneal Astigmatism and Equivalent Power with the MS-39 Tomographer Derived from Model Surface Fitting in a Cataractous Population.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a New Fully Automatic OLCR Biometer: Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Agreement with an SS-OCT Biometer.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Repeatability of biometric measures from the LenStar LS900 in a cataractous population.PloS one · 2025Article
- Repeatability of corneal curvature with the MS-39 anterior segment tomographer in a cataractous population.PloS one · 2025Article
- Repeatability of corneal measurements from the Casia2 anterior segment tomographer in a cataractous population.PloS one · 2025Article
- Comparison of Biometric Measurements and IOL Power Calculation Between a Swept-Source OCT and an Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry Biometer.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of a novel spectral-domain OCT biometer versus swept-source OCT or OLCR biometer in healthy pediatric ocular biometry.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Repeatability and agreement of two swept-source optical coherence tomographers and scheimpflug imaging for measurements of corneal curvature.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of repeatability and agreement of two optical biometers for intraocular lens power calculation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- IOL power calculation in long eyes: Selection of the best axial length adjustement factor using the most common formulas.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Comparison of axial length and anterior segment parameters of patients with myopia measured using 2 fourier-domain optical coherent biometry devices.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Clinical Evaluation of a New Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a new dynamic real-time visualization 25 kHz swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometer.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2024Article
- Repeatability of biometric measures from the IOLMaster 700 in a cataractous population.PloS one · 2024Article
- Evaluation and comparison of ocular biometric parameters obtained with Tomey OA-2000 in silicone oil-filled aphakic eyes.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Comparison of 2 modern swept-source optical biometers-IOLMaster 700 and Anterion.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
- Total keratometry for toric intraocular lens calculation: comparison from two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the repeatability of Anterion and compare the agreement of ocular biometric measurements and predicted intraocular lens (IOL) powers with other three optical biometers.
methodsFlat keratometry (Kf), steep keratometry (Ks), J0 and 45 vectors, central cornea thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and axial length (AL) from the Anterion, IOLMaster 700, Lenstar LS 900, and OA-2000 were recorded. The IOL powers were calculated with the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T, and Haigis formulas. The repeatability was evaluated using the within-subject standard deviation (Sw), repeatability coefficient (RC), coefficient of variation (COV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Inter-device agreement between the four biometers was assessed with the 95% limits of agreement.
resultsIn total, 101 right eyes of 101 participants were enrolled. The Anterion showed good repeatability for all the included biometric parameters with all the CoV ≤ 0.30% and ICC ≥ 0.930 except for J45 with moderate repeatability (ICC was 0.849). Good agreement was found among the four devices for Kf, Ks, J0, J45, ACD, and AL. Generally, wide 95% LoA was found for the predicted IOL powers with the four IOL calculation formulas between the four devices.
conclusionsThe Anterion showed good repeatability of biometric measurements for most parameters. Good agreement among the four optical biometers was achieved for all the parameters except for CCT and the predicted IOL power. The AL values exhibited the best repeatability with Anterion and the best agreement among the biometers in our study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35171331What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.