ReviewCirculation research2022
Coronary Arterial Function and Disease in Women With No Obstructive Coronary Arteries.
Review in Circulation research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Participation of Women in Cardiovascular Trials From 2017 to 2023: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR): a randomised controlled trial.Open heart · 2026Trial
- Diagnostic Value of Systemic Inflammatory Indices in Myocardial İnfarction With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: Comparison With Obstructive Myocardial Infarction and Non-Critical Coronary Artery Disease.Cardiology research · 2026Article
- Redesigning cardiovascular medicine around sex differences.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.MedComm · 2026Review
- Myocardial Infarction Without Obstructive Coronary Disease in Later Life: Insights from the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Twenty years of sex and gender science in health research: a policy statement from the Organization for the Study of Sex Differences.Biology of sex differences · 2026Review
- Sex-specific differences in coronary blood flow dynamics during coronary artery bypass surgery.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Guideline for Chronic Coronary Syndrome - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- The Bidirectionality of Psychosocial Stress and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Women; Recognition and Strategies for Management.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Myocardial perfusion and oxidative metabolism in healthy subjects: sex-specific insights from vasodilatory stressEJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Bridging the Diagnosis-Treatment Divide in Women with INOCA-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Gender Disparities in Ischemic Heart Disease Management: Underdiagnosis in Women and Differences in Treatment.Cureus · 2025Review
- Societal, occupational, and economic considerations for women with (M)INOCA: a narrative review.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2025Review
- Expanding diagnostic horizons: the role of multivessel coronary function testing in angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Article
- Impact of Left Ventricular Mass on Mortality in Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Sex-Specific Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitude and practice in patients with non-obstructive coronary ischaemia in Xinjiang: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Skeletal muscle adiposity, coronary microvascular dysfunction, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes.European heart journal · 2025Article
- Measurement of breast artery calcification using an artificial intelligence detection model and its association with major adverse cardiovascular events.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the leading cause of mortality in women. While traditional cardiovascular risk factors play an important role in the development of IHD in women, women may experience sex-specific IHD risk factors and pathophysiology, and thus female-specific risk stratification is needed for IHD prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Emerging data from the past 2 decades have significantly improved the understanding of IHD in women, including mechanisms of ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries and myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary arteries. Despite this progress, sex differences in IHD outcomes persist, particularly in young women. This review highlights the contemporary understanding of coronary arterial function and disease in women with no obstructive coronary arteries, including coronary anatomy and physiology, mechanisms of ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries and myocardial infarction with no obstructive coronary arteries, noninvasive and invasive diagnostic strategies, and management of IHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.