Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35176115›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

The efficacy of pioglitazone for renal protection in diabetic kidney disease.

Chao-Chung Ho, Yi-Sun Yang, Chien-Ning Huang, Shih-Chang Lo, Yu-Hsun Wang, Edy Kornelius

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Pioglitazone in diabetic kidney disease: forgotten but not gone.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chao-Chung HoSchool of Medicine of Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan.
Yi-Sun YangSchool of Medicine of Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan.
Chien-Ning HuangSchool of Medicine of Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan.
Shih-Chang LoSchool of Medicine of Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan.
Yu-Hsun WangDepartment of Medical Research, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan.
Edy KorneliusSchool of Medicine of Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9342-5467
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital · TWChung Shan Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited information on the efficacy of pioglitazone in diabetic kidney diseases (DKD). We evaluated whether pioglitazone exerts renal-protective effects in DKD patients. We designed a retrospective cohort study, which included 742 type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with DKD in Taiwan, with eGFR between 30 and 90 ml/min/1.73 m2 and UACR level 300-5000 mg/g. Patients not meeting the target range for HbA1c (above 7%) were given additional medication with pioglitazone (n = 111) or received standard care (non-pioglitazone group, n = 631). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of composite renal endpoints, which was defined as sustained eGFR<15 ml/min/1.73 m2 (confirmed by two measurements within 90 days); doubling of serum creatinine (compared to baseline); and the presence of hemodialysis or renal transplantation. The median follow-up duration was two years. At baseline, the mean HbA1C levels in the pioglitazone and non-pioglitazone groups were 8.8% and 8.1%, respectively; mean ages were 64.4 and 66.2 years old, respectively; diabetes durations were 14.3 and 12.3 years, respectively. Baseline eGFR showed no significant difference between the pioglitazone and non-pioglitazone groups (55.8 and 58.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively). In terms of gender, 63% of patients were male in the pioglitazone group compared with 57% in the non-pioglitazone group. Pioglitazone use did not reduce the risk of composite renal endpoints in DKD patients (HR: 0.97, 95% CI = 0.53-1.77), including persistent eGFR<15 ml/min/1.73 m2 (HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.46-2.52), doubling of serum creatinine (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.53-1.77), or ESRD (HR = 2.58, 95% CI = 0.29-23.04). The results were not changed after various adjustments. A non-significant albuminuria reduction was also noted after pioglitazone prescription in DKD patients. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to establish the effects of pioglitazone definitively.

Indexed as

AgedAlbuminuriaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansHypoglycemic AgentsKidneyMaleMiddle AgedPioglitazoneRetrospective StudiesTaiwanHypoglycemic AgentsPioglitazone

Identifiers

PMID35176115
PMCPMC8853567
OpenAlexW4213083250

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.