Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35179585›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Association of Prognostic Understanding With Health Care Use Among Older Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Kah Poh Loh, Christopher L Seplaki, Chandrika Sanapala, Reza Yousefi-Nooraie, Jennifer L Lund, Ronald M Epstein, Paul R Duberstein, Marie Flannery, Eva Culakova, Huiwen Xu and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02107443 (Improving Communication for Cancer Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02107443 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Communication for Cancer Treatment: Addressing Concerns of Older Cancer Patients and Caregivers

TypeinterventionalSponsorSupriya MohileRan2014 to 2020Enrolled546ConditionsAdult Solid Neoplasm, LymphomaArmsGeriatric Assessment Summary, Geriatric Assessment Targeted Recommendations, Geriatric Assessment (GA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Family caregiver roles and challenges in assisting patients with cancer treatment decision-making: Analysis of data from a national survey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Trends in hospice referral timing and location among individuals dying of ovarian cancer: persistence of missed opportunities.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Kah Poh LohJames P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Christopher L SeplakiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.
Chandrika SanapalaJames P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Reza Yousefi-NooraieDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.
Jennifer L LundDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Ronald M EpsteinCenter for Communication and Disparities Research, Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.
Paul R DubersteinDepartment of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey.
Marie FlannerySchool of Nursing, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.
Eva CulakovaDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.
Huiwen XuDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, School of Medicine, Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.
Colin McHughJames P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Heidi D KlepinSection on Hematology and Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Po-Ju LinDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.
Erin WatsonPrinceton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Valerie Aarne GrossmanSCOREboard Advisory Group, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Jane Jijun LiuHeartland National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Decatur, Illinois.
Jodi GeerMetro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Program, St Louis Park.
Mark A O'RourkeNCORP of the Carolinas (Greenville Health System NCORP), Greenville, South Carolina.
Karen MustianDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.
Supriya G MohileJames P. Wilmot Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
University of Rochester · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USHeartland Cancer Research · USMetro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium · USPrinceton University · USPrisma Health · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

URCC NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, KAREN M. MUSTIAN · 2014 to 2026
$67.7M
A Patient-Oriented Research Program in Geriatric OncologyK24AG056589 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Supriya G. Mohile · 2018 to 2026
$1.5M
A novel mobile health exercise intervention for older patients with myeloid neoplasmsR00CA237744 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI LOH, KAH POH · 2021 to 2023
$747k
Geriatric Oncology Research Infrastructure to Improve Clinical CareR21AG059206 · NIA · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI DALE, WILLIAM, MOHILE, SUPRIYA G. · 2018 to 2019
$478k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA237744NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189961NIA NIH HHS K24 AG056589NIA NIH HHS R21 AG059206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: A poor prognostic understanding regarding curability is associated with lower odds of hospice use among patients with cancer. However, the association between poor prognostic understanding or prognostic discordance and health care use among older adults with advanced incurable cancers is not well characterized. Objective: To evaluate the association of poor prognostic understanding and patient-oncologist prognostic discordance with hospitalization and hospice use among older adults with advanced cancers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a post hoc secondary analysis of a cluster randomized clinical trial that recruited patients from October 29, 2014, to April 28, 2017. Data were collected from community oncology practices affiliated with the University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program. The parent trial enrolled 541 patients who were aged 70 years or older and were receiving or considering any line of cancer treatment for incurable solid tumors or lymphomas; the patients' oncologists and caregivers (if available) were also enrolled. Patients were followed up for at least 1 year. Data were analyzed from January 3 to 16, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: At enrollment, patients and oncologists were asked about their beliefs regarding cancer curability (100%, >50%, 50%, <50%, and 0%; answers other than 0% reflected poor prognostic understanding) and life expectancy (≤6 months, 7-12 months, 1-2 years, 2-5 years, and >5 years; answers of >5 years reflected poor prognostic understanding). Any difference between oncologist and patient in response options was considered discordant. Outcomes were any hospitalization and hospice use at 6 months captured by the clinical research associates. Results: Among the 541 patients, the mean (SD) age was 76.6 (5.2) years, 264 of 540 (49%) were female, and 486 of 540 (90%) were White. Poor prognostic understanding regarding curability was reported for 59% (206 of 348) of patients, and poor prognostic understanding regarding life expectancy estimates was reported for 41% (205 of 496) of patients. Approximately 60% (202 of 336) of patient-oncologist dyads were discordant regarding curability, and 72% (356 of 492) of patient-oncologist dyads were discordant regarding life expectancy estimates. Poor prognostic understanding regarding life expectancy estimates was associated with lower odds of hospice use (adjusted odds ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.59). Discordance regarding life expectancy estimates was associated with greater odds of hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.01-2.66). Conclusions and Relevance: This study highlights different constructs of prognostic understanding and the need to better understand the association between prognostic understanding and health care use among older adult patients with advanced cancer. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02107443.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHospice CareHospitalizationHumansLife ExpectancyMalePatient SatisfactionPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID35179585
PMCPMC8857680
OpenAlexW4212960505

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.