Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35181574›Full record

ReviewBone2022

RANKL biology.

Noriko Takegahara, Hyunsoo Kim, Yongwon Choi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bone, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of comparative safety in randomized controlled trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bone and Infections: An Osteoimmunological Interplay.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noriko TakegaharaDepartments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hyunsoo KimDepartments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Yongwon ChoiDepartments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: ychoi3@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Regulation of T cell responses to oral antigensR01AI125284 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHOI, YONGWON · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
Cell Adhesion Regulation of Osteoclast MaturationR01AR069546 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHOI, YONGWON · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Protocadherin 7 and Osteoclast MaturationR01AR077526 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHOI, YONGWON · 2020 to 2025
$1.8M
IgSF11 Signaling Controls Osteoclast Maturation and Pathogenic Bone LossR01AR080021 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI YONGWON CHOI · 2022 to 2026
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125284NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR069546NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR077526NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR080021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL), its cognate receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK), and the decoy receptor osteoprotegerin (OPG) were discovered, a number of studies have uncovered the crucial role of the RANKL-RANK-OPG pathway in controlling the key aspect of bone homeostasis, the immune system, inflammation, cancer, and other systems under pathophysiological condition. These findings have expanded the understanding of the multifunctional biology of the RANKL-RANK-OPG pathway and led to the development of therapeutic potential targeting this pathway. The successful development and application of anti-RANKL antibody in treating diseases causing bone loss validates the utility of therapeutic approaches based on the modulation of this pathway. Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated the involvement of the RANKL-RANK pathway in osteoblast differentiation and bone formation, shedding light on the RANKL-RANK dual signaling in coupling bone resorption and bone formation. In this review, we will summarize the current understanding of the RANKL-RANK-OPG system in the context of the bone and the immune system as well as the impact of this pathway in disease conditions, including cancer development and metastasis.

Indexed as

Bone ResorptionRANK LigandBiologyBone and BonesHumansOsteoprotegerinReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa BOsteoprotegerinRANK LigandReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa B

Identifiers

PMID35181574
PMCPMC9035122
OpenAlexW4212859456

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.