Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35186025›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Genome-Wide Assessment of a Korean Composite Pig Breed, Woori-Heukdon.

Yong-Min Kim, Ha-Seung Seong, Young-Sin Kim, Joon-Ki Hong, Soo-Jin Sa, Jungjae Lee, Jun-Hee Lee, Kyu-Ho Cho, Won-Hyong Chung, Jung-Woo Choi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yong-Min KimSwine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan, South Korea.
Ha-Seung SeongSwine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan, South Korea.
Young-Sin KimSwine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan, South Korea.
Joon-Ki HongSwine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan, South Korea.
Soo-Jin SaSwine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan, South Korea.
Jungjae LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, College of Biotechnology and Natural Resources, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, South Korea.
Jun-Hee LeeInstitute of Agriculture and Life Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, South Korea.
Kyu-Ho ChoSwine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan, South Korea.
Won-Hyong ChungResearch Group of Healthcare, Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju, South Korea.
Jung-Woo ChoiDepartment of Animal Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, South Korea.
Eun-Seok ChoSwine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan, South Korea.
National Institute of Animal Science · KRKangwon National University · KRRural Development Administration · KRChung-Ang University · KRGyeongsang National University · KRKorea Food Research Institute · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Korean synthetic pig breed, Woori-Heukdon (WRH; F3), was developed by crossing parental breeds (Korean native pig [KNP] and Korean Duroc [DUC]) with their crossbred populations (F1 and F2). This study in genome-wide assessed a total of 2,074 pigs which include the crossbred and the parental populations using the Illumina PorcineSNP60 BeadChip. After quality control of the initial datasets, we performed population structure, genetic diversity, and runs of homozygosity (ROH) analyses. Population structure analyses showed that crossbred populations were genetically influenced by the parental breeds according to their generation stage in the crossbreeding scheme. Moreover, principal component analysis showed the dispersed cluster of WRH, which might reflect introducing a new breeding group into the previous one. Expected heterozygosity values, which were used to assess genetic diversity, were .365, .349, .336, .330, and .211 for WRH, F2, F1, DUC, and KNP, respectively. The inbreeding coefficient based on ROH was the highest in KNP (.409), followed by WRH (.186), DUC (.178), F2 (.107), and F1 (.035). Moreover, the frequency of short ROH decreased according to the crossing stage (from F1 to WRH). Alternatively, the frequency of medium and long ROH increased, which indicated recent inbreeding in F2 and WRH. Furthermore, gene annotation of the ROH islands in WRH that might be inherited from their parental breeds revealed several interesting candidate genes that may be associated with adaptation, meat quality, production, and reproduction traits in pigs.

Indexed as

genetic diversityKorean native pigruns of homozygosityselection signaturesynthetic breedWoori-Heukdon

Identifiers

PMID35186025
PMCPMC8847790
OpenAlexW4210742176

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.