Evidence mapPaperPMID 35193993Full record

SynthesisGut and liver2022

Accuracy of Noninvasive Scoring Systems in Assessing Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sangsoo Han, Miyoung Choi, Bora Lee, Hye-Won Lee, Seong Hee Kang, Yuri Cho, Sang Bong Ahn, Do Seon Song, Dae Won Jun, Jieun Lee and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Gut and liver, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Response.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Sangsoo HanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9709-3332
Miyoung ChoiClinical Evidence Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2424-9965
Bora LeeDepartment of Statistics, Graduate School of Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6322-5712
Hye-Won LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3552-3560
Seong Hee KangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0783-509X
Yuri ChoCenter for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4488-5352
Sang Bong AhnDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7419-5259
Do Seon SongDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8278-4878
Dae Won JunDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2875-6139
Jieun LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9494-2493
Jeong-Ju YooDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7802-0381
Soonchunhyang University · KRYonsei University · KRChung-Ang University · KREulji University · KRHanyang University · KRNational Cancer Center · KRNational Evidenc- based healthcare Collaborating Agency · KRThe Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: Several noninvasive scoring systems have been developed to determine the risk of advanced fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We examined the diagnostic accuracy of the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) in patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Methods: For this meta-analysis, various databases including PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, OVID Medline and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched. After the acquired abstracts were reviewed by two investigators, manuscripts were chosen for a full-text examination. Results: Thirty-six studies evaluating biopsy-proven NAFLD were selected for meta-analysis. A total of 14,992 patients were analyzed. The lower cutoff sensitivity of the FIB-4 score predicting histological fibrosis stage 3 or more (≥F3) was 69%, with specificity of 64%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 1.96, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.47. The low baseline sensitivity of the NFS score predicting ≥F3 was 70%, with a specificity of 61%, LR+ of 1.83, and LR- of 0.48. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of the FIB-4 score predicting ≥F3 and ≥F2 were 76% and 68%, respectively. The AUC values of the NFS score predicting ≥F3 and ≥F2 were 74% and 60%, respectively. Conclusions: The FIB-4 or NFS test can be used to predict the degree of liver fibrosis in NAFLD, and the diagnostic accuracy resulted as relatively high in fibrosis stages of F3 or higher.

Indexed as

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesBiopsyHumansLiverLiver CirrhosisROC CurveSeverity of Illness IndexAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesLiver fibrosisMeta-analysisNonalcoholic fatty liver diseasePredictive value of tests

Identifiers

PMID35193993
PMCPMC9668505
OpenAlexW4213445657

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.