ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2022
Seminal fluid gene expression and reproductive fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Seminal Fluid Protein Acp29AB Shifts Egg-Laying Timing inEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- No Evidence of Sexually Antagonistic Coevolution in Drosophila Reproductive Tract Transcriptomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Mating system variation and gene expression in the male reproductive tract of Peromyscus mice.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Genomic Islands of Divergence Between Drosophila yakuba Subspecies are Predominantly Driven by Chromosomal Inversions and the Recombination Landscape.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Evolution and genetics of accessory gland transcriptome divergence between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.Genetics · 2024Article
- The seminal odorant binding protein Obp56g is required for mating plug formation and male fertility ineLife · 2023Article
- Male-derived transcripts isolated from the mated female reproductive tract in Drosophila melanogaster.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- The effect of seminal fluid gene expression on paternity.Evolution letters · 2023Article
- A predominant role of genotypic variation in both expression of sperm competition genes and paternity success inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Genotype-by-environment interactions influence the composition of theProceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- The carboxypeptidase B and carbonic anhydrase genes play a reproductive regulatory role during multiple matings inFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
- Does perception of female cues modulate male short-term fitness components inEcology and evolution · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rapid evolution of seminal fluid proteins (SFPs) has been suggested to be driven by adaptations to postcopulatory sexual selection (e.g. sperm competition). However, we have recently shown that most SFPs evolve rapidly under relaxed selective pressures. Given the role of SFPs in competition for fertilization phenotypes, like the ability to transfer and store sperm and the modulation of female receptivity and ovulation, the prevalence of selectively relaxed SFPs appears as a conundrum. One possible explanation is that selection on SFPs might be relaxed in terms of protein amino acid content, but adjustments of expression are essential for post-mating function. Interestingly, there is a general lack of systematic implementation of gene expression perturbation assays to monitor their effect on phenotypes related to sperm competition.
resultsWe successfully manipulated the expression of 16 SFP encoding genes using tissue-specific knockdowns (KDs) and determined the effect of these genes' perturbation on three important post-mating phenotypes: female refractoriness to remating, defensive (P1), and offensive (P2) sperm competitive abilities in Drosophila melanogaster. Our analyses show that KDs of tested SFP genes do not affect female refractoriness to remating and P2, however, most gene KDs significantly decreased P1. Moreover, KDs of SFP genes that are selectively constrained in terms of protein-coding sequence evolution have lower P1 than KDs of genes evolving under relaxed selection.
conclusionsOur results suggest a more predominant role, than previously acknowledged, of variation in gene expression than coding sequence changes on sperm competitive ability in D. melanogaster.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.