Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35200716›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2022

Leukocyte-Mediated Cardiac Repair after Myocardial Infarction in Non-Regenerative vs. Regenerative Systems.

Elizabeth Anne Peterson, Jisheng Sun, Jinhu Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optimized cardiac leukocyte isolation for flow cytometry enumeration and sorting.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Zebrafish in Cardiovascular Disease Research: from Model to Application.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Quo Vadis? Immunodynamics of Myeloid Cells after Myocardial Infarction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth Anne PetersonDivision of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Jisheng SunDivision of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0814-1118
Jinhu WangDivision of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Emory University · US

Funding

Research Trainng in Academic CardiologyT32HL007745 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, WILLIAM ROBERT · 1994 to 2023
$10.6M
Characterization of hapln1a positive cells during zebrafish heart regenerationR01HL142762 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Jinhu Wang · 2019 to 2026
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL142762NIH HHS 5T32 HL007745-28NIH HHS R01 HL142762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Innate and adaptive leukocytes rapidly mobilize to ischemic tissues after myocardial infarction in response to damage signals released from necrotic cells. Leukocytes play important roles in cardiac repair and regeneration such as inflammation initiation and resolution; the removal of dead cells and debris; the deposition of the extracellular matrix and granulation tissue; supporting angiogenesis and cardiomyocyte proliferation; and fibrotic scar generation and resolution. By organizing and comparing the present knowledge of leukocyte recruitment and function after cardiac injury in non-regenerative to regenerative systems, we propose that the leukocyte response to cardiac injury differs in non-regenerative adult mammals such as humans and mice in comparison to cardiac regenerative models such as neonatal mice and adult zebrafish. Specifically, extensive neutrophil, macrophage, and T-cell persistence contributes to a lengthy inflammatory period in non-regenerative systems for adverse cardiac remodeling and heart failure development, whereas their quick removal supports inflammation resolution in regenerative systems for new contractile tissue formation and coronary revascularization. Surprisingly, other leukocytes have not been examined in regenerative model systems. With this review, we aim to encourage the development of improved immune cell markers and tools in cardiac regenerative models for the identification of new immune targets in non-regenerative systems to develop new therapies.

Indexed as

cardiac injuryhearthumansimmune cellsinflammatoryleukocytemicemyocardial infarctionregenerationrepairzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID35200716
PMCPMC8877434
OpenAlexW4213090991

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.