ArticleUrolithiasis2022
Predictive accuracy of the modified SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for uroseptic shock after mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparing the Predictive Value of SOFA and SIRS for Mortality in the Early Hours of Hospitalization of Sepsis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Development and validation of the UCSS score, a novel method to predict septic shock after PCNL.World journal of urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the plausibility and utility of utilizing a modified SOFA (mSOFA) score for predicting uroseptic shock after mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. A cohort of 707 patients who received mini-PCNL from August 2019 to December 2020 was retrospectively evaluated. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to compare the predictive value of septic shock between mSOFA, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and qSOFA. Among 707 patients, 24 patients experienced uroseptic shock after mini-PCNL. Compared with the no uroseptic shock group, the proportion of females and rates of preoperative urine culture, renal pelvis urine culture and stone culture positivity were higher in the uroseptic shock group, with high levels of preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) and postoperative procalcitonin (PCT). In the uroseptic shock group, the mSOFA score increased by two or more points in 83.3%; 79.2% had at least two SIRS criteria, and 100% had a qSOFA score of at least one point. mSOFA score (AUROC = 0.866, 95% CI: 0.779-0.954) exhibited greater discrimination for uroseptic shock after PCNL than SIRS (AUROC = 0.838, 95% CI: 0.742-0.943) and qSOFA (AUROC = 0.851, 95% CI: 0.811-0.892). In conclusion, the predictive value of the modified SOFA score for uroseptic shock after mini-PCNL was greater than that of the qSOFA score or SIRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35201365What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.