Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35209139›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Comparative Evaluation of Different Targeted and Untargeted Analytical Approaches to Assess Greek Extra Virgin Olive Oil Quality and Authentication.

Sofia Drakopoulou, Emmanouil Orfanakis, Ioulia Karagiannaki, Fragiskos Gaitis, Stavroula Skoulika, Andreas Papaioannou, George Boukouvalas, George Petropoulos, Vassilios Katsoudas, Renate Kontzedaki and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sofia DrakopoulouLaboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis Zografou, 15771 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-4496-7494
Emmanouil OrfanakisInstitute of Electronic Structure and Laser, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (IESL-FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-8183-2794
Ioulia KaragiannakiInstitute of Electronic Structure and Laser, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (IESL-FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece.
Fragiskos GaitisFood Analytical and Research Laboratories of Athens, Directorate of Laboratories, Hellenic Food Authority (EFET) 143 42, 31 Anagenniseos Str, Nea Philadelfeia, 11526 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6242-2116
Stavroula SkoulikaFood Analytical and Research Laboratories of Athens, Directorate of Laboratories, Hellenic Food Authority (EFET) 143 42, 31 Anagenniseos Str, Nea Philadelfeia, 11526 Athens, Greece.
Andreas PapaioannouFood Analytical and Research Laboratories of Athens, Directorate of Laboratories, Hellenic Food Authority (EFET) 143 42, 31 Anagenniseos Str, Nea Philadelfeia, 11526 Athens, Greece.
George BoukouvalasFood Analytical and Research Laboratories of Athens, Directorate of Laboratories, Hellenic Food Authority (EFET) 143 42, 31 Anagenniseos Str, Nea Philadelfeia, 11526 Athens, Greece.
George PetropoulosFood Analytical and Research Laboratories of Athens, Directorate of Laboratories, Hellenic Food Authority (EFET) 143 42, 31 Anagenniseos Str, Nea Philadelfeia, 11526 Athens, Greece.
Vassilios KatsoudasFood Analytical and Research Laboratories of Athens, Directorate of Laboratories, Hellenic Food Authority (EFET) 143 42, 31 Anagenniseos Str, Nea Philadelfeia, 11526 Athens, Greece.
Renate KontzedakiInstitute of Electronic Structure and Laser, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (IESL-FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece.
Aggelos PhilippidisInstitute of Electronic Structure and Laser, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (IESL-FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6418-1512
Aikaterini ZoumiInstitute of Electronic Structure and Laser, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (IESL-FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1771-0386
Marilena DasenakiLaboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis Zografou, 15771 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0853-4547
Nikolaos S ThomaidisLaboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis Zografou, 15771 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-4624-4735
Michalis VelegrakisInstitute of Electronic Structure and Laser, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (IESL-FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-2476-8706

Funding

General Secretariat for Research and Technology 2018ΣΕ01300000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) is a key component of the Mediterranean diet, with several health benefits derived from its consumption. Moreover, due to its eminent market position, EVOO has been thoroughly studied over the last several years, aiming at its authentication, but also to reveal the chemical profile inherent to its beneficial properties. In the present work, a comparative study was conducted to assess Greek EVOOs' quality and authentication utilizing different analytical approaches, both targeted and untargeted. 173 monovarietal EVOOs from three emblematic Greek cultivars (Koroneiki, Kolovi and Adramytiani), obtained during the harvesting years of 2018-2020, were analyzed and quantified as per their fatty acids methyl esters (FAMEs) composition via the official method (EEC) No 2568/91, as well as their bioactive content through liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) methodology. In addition to FAMEs analysis, EVOO samples were also analyzed via HRMS-untargeted metabolomics and optical spectroscopy techniques (visible absorption, fluorescence and Raman). The data retrieved from all applied techniques were analyzed with Machine Learning methods for the authentication of the EVOOs' variety. The models' predictive performance was calculated through test samples, while for further evaluation 30 commercially available EVOO samples were also examined in terms of variety. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study where different techniques from the fields of standard analysis, spectrometry and optical spectroscopy are applied to the same EVOO samples, providing strong insight into EVOOs chemical profile and a comparative evaluation through the different platforms.

Indexed as

Food AnalysisFood QualityFatty AcidsFood IngredientsGreeceMetabolomicsOlive OilSpectrum AnalysisFatty AcidsFood IngredientsOlive Oilauthenticityextra virgin olive oilFAMEsfluorescenceHRMSmachine learningmetabolomicsoptical spectroscopyRamanvariety identificationvisible absorption

Identifiers

PMID35209139
PMCPMC8874659

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.