Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35210307›Full record

Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2022

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase 3b/4 CheckMate 920 trial.

Scott S Tykodi, Lucio N Gordan, Robert S Alter, Edward Arrowsmith, Michael R Harrison, Ivor Percent, Rakesh Singal, Peter Van Veldhuizen, Daniel J George, Thomas Hutson and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIClinical Trial, Phase IV
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02982954 (Phase 3b/4 Safety Trial of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab in Subjects With Previously Untreated, Advanced or Metastatic RCC), which is not on this map. Cited by 94 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02982954 phase4completednot on this map

Phase 3b/4 Safety Trial of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab in Subjects With Previously Untreated, Advanced or Metastatic RCC (CheckMate 920: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 920)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2017 to 2021Enrolled211ConditionsRenal Cell CarcinomaArmsNivolumab, Ipilimumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Observational

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Scott S TykodiDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA stykodi@fredhutch.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0399-0965
Lucio N GordanFlorida Cancer Specialists, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Robert S AlterJohn Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, USA.
Edward ArrowsmithSarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA.
Michael R HarrisonDuke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ivor PercentFlorida Cancer Specialists, Port Charlotte, Florida, USA.
Rakesh SingalSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida, USA.
Peter Van VeldhuizenDepartment of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Daniel J GeorgeDuke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0836-8542
Thomas HutsonTexas A&M University College of Medicine, Bryan, Texas, USA.
Joshua ZhangDepartment of Clinical Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Jesus ZocoSyneos Health, Braine l'Alleud, Belgium.
Jennifer L JohansenUS Medical Immunology & Fibrosis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Arash Rezazadeh KalebastyNorton Cancer Institute, Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Bristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) · DECancer Institute (WIA) · INFlorida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute · USHackensack University Medical Center · USNorton Healthcare · USSarah Cannon · USSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center · USSyneos Health (United States) · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCheckMate 920 (NCT02982954) is a multicohort, phase 3b/4 clinical trial of nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment in predominantly US community-based patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and clinical features mostly excluded from phase 3 trials. We report safety and efficacy results from the advanced non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC) cohort of CheckMate 920.

methodsPatients with previously untreated advanced/metastatic nccRCC, Karnofsky performance status ≥70%, and any International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk received up to four doses of nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks followed by nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks for ≤2 years or until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade ≥3 immune-mediated adverse events (AEs) within 100 days of last dose of study drug. Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS; both investigator-assessed), time to response (TTR), and duration of response (DOR), all using RECIST V.1.1. Overall survival (OS) was exploratory.

resultsFifty-two patients with nccRCC (unclassified histology, 42.3%; papillary, 34.6%; chromophobe, 13.5%; translocation-associated, 3.8%; collecting duct, 3.8%; renal medullary, 1.9%) received treatment. With 24.1 months minimum study follow-up, median duration of therapy (range) was 3.5 (0.0-25.8) months for nivolumab and 2.1 (0.0-3.9) months for ipilimumab. Median (range) number of doses received was 4.5 (1-28) for nivolumab and 4.0 (1-4) for ipilimumab. Grade 3-4 immune-mediated AEs were diarrhea/colitis (7.7%), rash (5.8%), nephritis and renal dysfunction (3.8%), hepatitis (1.9%), adrenal insufficiency (1.9%), and hypophysitis (1.9%). No grade 5 immune-mediated AEs occurred. ORR (n=46) was 19.6% (95% CI 9.4 to 33.9). Two patients achieved complete response (papillary, n=1; unclassified, n=1), seven achieved partial response (papillary, n=4; unclassified, n=3), and 17 had stable disease. Median TTR was 2.8 (range 2.1-14.8) months. Median DOR was not reached (range 0.0+-27.8+); eight of nine responders remain without reported progression. Median PFS (n=52) was 3.7 (95% CI 2.7 to 4.6) months. Median OS (n=52) was 21.2 (95% CI 16.6 to not estimable) months.

conclusionsNivolumab plus ipilimumab for previously untreated advanced nccRCC showed no new safety signals and encouraging antitumor activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02982954.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansIpilimumabKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNivolumabYoung AdultIpilimumabNivolumabcombinationdrug therapyimmunotherapykidney neoplasmsurologic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35210307
PMCPMC8883262
OpenAlexW4213413657

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.