Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35210347›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines addressing acupuncture interventions: a systematic survey of 133 guidelines and 433 acupuncture recommendations.

Xiaorong Tang, Xiaoshuang Shi, Hong Zhao, Liming Lu, Ze Chen, Yixuan Feng, Lanping Liu, Ruihua Duan, Pingping Zhang, Yuqin Xu and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06703671 (The Efficacy and Safety of Electroacupuncture Compared With Sham Acupuncture in Patients With Discogenic Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06703671 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy and Safety of Electroacupuncture Compared With Sham Acupuncture in Patients With Discogenic Low Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled240ConditionsDiscogenic Low Back PainArmselectroacupuncture group, sham-acupuncture group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Xiaorong Tang *South China Research Center for Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Medical College of Acu-Moxi and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4129-7544
Xiaoshuang Shi *Gastroenterology dept, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1515-4072
Hong ZhaoInstitute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Liming LuSouth China Research Center for Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Medical College of Acu-Moxi and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Ze ChenSouth China Research Center for Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Medical College of Acu-Moxi and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yixuan FengInstitute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lanping LiuDepartment of Acupuncture, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guang'anmen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ruihua DuanThe first Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Pingping ZhangDepartment of Acupuncture, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guang'anmen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuqin XuInstitute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shuo CuiInstitute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Fen GongThe first Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jingwen FeiDepartment of Acupuncture, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guang'anmen Hospital, Beijing, China.
Neng-Gui XuSouth China Research Center for Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Medical College of Acu-Moxi and Rehabilitation, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xianghong JingInstitute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China madisonz1220@gmail.com jxhtjb@263.net.
Gordon GuyattDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Yu-Qing ZhangInstitute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China madisonz1220@gmail.com jxhtjb@263.net.ORCID 0000-0002-6318-3575

Funding

HSRD VA CDA 13-024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically summarise acupuncture-related Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs)'s clinical and methodological characteristics and critically appraise their methodology quality.

designWe summarised the characteristics of the guidelines and recommendations and evaluated their methodological quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. DATA SOURCES: Nine databases were searched from 1 January 2010 to 20 September 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included the latest version of acupuncture CPGs, which must have used at least one systematic review addressing the benefits and harms of alternative care options to inform acupuncture recommendations. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Reviewers, working in pairs, independently screened and extracted data. When there are statistical differences among types of CPGs, we reported the data by type in the text, but when not, we reported the overall data.

resultsOf the 133 eligible guidelines, musculoskeletal and connective tissue diseases proved the most commonly addressed therapeutic areas. According to the AGREE II instrument, the CPG was moderate quality in the domain of clarity of scope and purpose, clarity of presentation, the rigour of development, stakeholder involvement and low quality in editorial independence, and applicability. The study identified 433 acupuncture-related recommendations; 380 recommended the use of acupuncture, 28 recommended against the use of acupuncture and 25 considered acupuncture but did not make recommendations. Of the 303 recommendations that used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to determine the strength of recommendations, 152 were weak recommendations, 131 were strong recommendations, of which 104 were supported by low or very low certainty evidence (discordant recommendations).

conclusionIn the past 10 years, a large number of CPGs addressing acupuncture interventions exist. Although these guidelines may be as or more rigorous than many others, considerable room for improvement remains.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyDatabases, FactualData ManagementHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicSystematic Reviews as Topiccomplementary medicinehealth economicspublic health

Identifiers

PMID35210347
PMCPMC8883258

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.