Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35211745›Full record

SynthesisNutrition reviews2022

Biomarkers of dietary patterns: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Shuang Liang, Reeja F Nasir, Kim S Bell-Anderson, Clémence A Toniutti, Fiona M O'Leary, Michael R Skilton

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrition reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Experience Sampling as a dietary assessment method: a scoping review towards implementation.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuang LiangThe Boden Initiative, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3865-8655
Reeja F NasirThe Boden Initiative, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kim S Bell-AndersonSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Clémence A ToniuttiThe Boden Initiative, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Fiona M O'LearySusan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Michael R SkiltonThe Boden Initiative, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextMost methods for assessing dietary intake have considerable measurement error. Dietary biomarkers are objective tools for dietary assessment. Dietary biomarkers of dietary patterns have not been well described, despite modern dietary guidelines endorsing dietary patterns.

objectiveThis systematic review sought to describe the dietary biomarkers commonly used to assess dietary patterns, and the novel biomarkers of dietary patterns identified by exploratory studies. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, PreMEDLINE, and CINAHL databases were searched. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction and bias assessment were undertaken in duplicate. DATA ANALYSIS: A qualitative approach was applied, without statistical analysis.

conclusionIn controlled settings, dietary biomarkers of single nutrients or of individual foods or food groups are commonly used to assess compliance with dietary patterns. However, currently, there are no dietary biomarkers or biomarker profiles that are able to identify the specific dietary pattern that has been consumed by an individual. Future work should seek to validate novel dietary biomarkers and biomarker profiles that are indicative of specific dietary patterns and their characteristics. A dietary biomarker panel consisting of multiple biomarkers is almost certainly necessary to capture the complexity of dietary patterns. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42019129839.

Indexed as

DietFoodBiomarkersHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBiomarkersbiological markersbiomarkerdietary assessmentdietary pattern

Identifiers

PMID35211745
PMCPMC9263887

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.