Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35212815›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

The preoperative G8 geriatric screening tool independently predicts survival in older patients with endometrial cancer: results of a retrospective single-institution cohort study.

Katharina Anic, Christin Altehoefer, Slavomir Krajnak, Mona Wanda Schmidt, Roxana Schwab, Valerie Catherine Linz, Marcus Schmidt, Christiane Westphalen, Erik Kristoffer Hartmann, Annette Hasenburg and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katharina AnicDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. katharina.anic@unimedizin-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3001-5452
Christin AltehoeferDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Slavomir KrajnakDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Mona Wanda SchmidtDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Roxana SchwabDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Valerie Catherine LinzDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Marcus SchmidtDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Christiane WestphalenDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Erik Kristoffer HartmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Annette HasenburgDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Marco Johannes BattistaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of global health status assessment tools in elderly patients with endometrial cancer (EC) on survival.

methodsPreoperative frailty status was assessed by the G8 geriatric screening tool (G8 Score), Lee Schonberg prognostic index, Charlson Comorbidity index and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status System in women older than 60 years with EC. Univariable and multivariable Cox-regression analyses, as well as Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed to determine the prognostic impact. Statistical analyses were adjusted for cancer entity-specific risk factors such as conventional histopathological tumor characteristics and relevant anamnestic life style parameters.

results153 patients with all stages of EC who were operated at the University Medical Center Mainz between 2008 and 2019 were included. In multivariable analyses, only the G8 Score retained independent significance as a prognostic factor for disease-specific survival (DSS) (HR:4.58; 95% CI [1.35-15.51]) and overall survival (OS) (HR:2.89; 95% CI [1.31-6.39]. 92 patients (61.3%) were classified as G8-non-frail with a significantly increased DSS and OS rate compared to the 58 G8-frail patients (DSS:93.8% vs. 60.8%; p < 0.001 and OS:88.2% vs. 49.7%; p < 0.001; respectively).

conclusionsThis is the first study demonstrates the substantial clinical and prognostic impact of the G8 Score on survival in elderly women with EC. Assessing the frailty status to estimate the individual vulnerability of elderly cancer patients could be useful in preoperative decision-making to individualize treatment plans such as the surgical radicality and to improve pre- and postoperative morbidity.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsFrailtyAgedCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansRetrospective StudiesEndometrial carcinomasFrailtyG8 ScoreGlobal health statusPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID35212815
PMCPMC9931812
OpenAlexW4214600218

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.