ReviewPharmaceutics2022
The Hitchhiker's Guide to Human Therapeutic Nanoparticle Development.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toxicity of nanostructures in drug delivery applications.Pharmaceutical science advances · 2026Review
- Nanotoxicology: Emerging Challenges and Future Solutions for Safe Nanomaterial Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Are Silver and Gold Nanoparticles Obtained by 'Green' Synthesis Biocompatible?Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A destination-driven framework for nanoparticle-enabled targeted protein degradation.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- From Remedy to Therapy: Confronting the Bioavailability Bottleneck inPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances in applications of siRNA in cancer therapy: challenges and opportunities.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Comparative analysis of antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of nickel oxide nanoparticles among uropathogenic Escherichia coli O-serotypes isolated from patients with urinary tract infections based on molecular typing.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Targeting Ferroptosis Pathways for Synaptic Protection in Sevoflurane-Induced Cognitive Impairment: A Nanomedicine Approach.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Nanomaterial-Based Therapeutic Delivery: Integrating Redox Biology, Genetic Engineering, and Imaging-Guided Treatment.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Carbon Quantum Dots as Versatile Nanosystems for Biomedical Innovation: Mechanisms, Applications, and Translational Prospects.British journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
- Targeted drug delivery systems for pancreatic cancer therapy: advances, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Nanomaterial-enabled delivery of plant-derived bioactive metabolites for diabetic retinopathy: from evidence appraisal to preclinical translation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Review
- Nanoformulated Phytochemicals Against Pancreatic Cancer: Emerging Advances in Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- The progress and perspective of nanomedicine in modulating the tumor immune microenvironment.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Article
- Nanomedicine in Ovarian Cancer: Advances in Imaging, Targeted Delivery, and Theranostic Therapeutic Platforms.Cancers · 2025Review
- Bio-Functional Nanomaterials for Enhanced Lung Cancer Therapy: The Synergistic Roles of Vitamins D and K.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Nano-Phytomedicine: Harnessing Plant-Derived Phytochemicals in Nanocarriers for Targeted Human Health Applications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Perspective on Nano-Enabled Photostimulation Biointerfaces.ACS nano · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanomedicine plays an essential role in developing new therapies through novel drug delivery systems, diagnostic and imaging systems, vaccine development, antibacterial tools, and high-throughput screening. One of the most promising drug delivery systems are nanoparticles, which can be designed with various compositions, sizes, shapes, and surface modifications. These nanosystems have improved therapeutic profiles, increased bioavailability, and reduced the toxicity of the product they carry. However, the clinical translation of nanomedicines requires a thorough understanding of their properties to avoid problems with the most questioned aspect of nanosystems: safety. The particular physicochemical properties of nano-drugs lead to the need for additional safety, quality, and efficacy testing. Consequently, challenges arise during the physicochemical characterization, the production process, in vitro characterization, in vivo characterization, and the clinical stages of development of these biopharmaceuticals. The lack of a specific regulatory framework for nanoformulations has caused significant gaps in the requirements needed to be successful during their approval, especially with tests that demonstrate their safety and efficacy. Researchers face many difficulties in establishing evidence to extrapolate results from one level of development to another, for example, from an in vitro demonstration phase to an in vivo demonstration phase. Additional guidance is required to cover the particularities of this type of product, as some challenges in the regulatory framework do not allow for an accurate assessment of NPs with sufficient evidence of clinical success. This work aims to identify current regulatory issues during the implementation of nanoparticle assays and describe the major challenges that researchers have faced when exposing a new formulation. We further reflect on the current regulatory standards required for the approval of these biopharmaceuticals and the requirements demanded by the regulatory agencies. Our work will provide helpful information to improve the success of nanomedicines by compiling the challenges described in the literature that support the development of this novel encapsulation system. We propose a step-by-step approach through the different stages of the development of nanoformulations, from their design to the clinical stage, exemplifying the different challenges and the measures taken by the regulatory agencies to respond to these challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.