Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35214039›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2022

Strategies to Overcome Biological Barriers Associated with Pulmonary Drug Delivery.

Adam J Plaunt, Tam L Nguyen, Michel R Corboz, Vladimir S Malinin, David C Cipolla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Navigating theNanoscale advances · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Nanomedicine Innovations for Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Research Progress on Liposome Pulmonary Delivery ofJournal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam J PlauntInsmed Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ 08807, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5341-6411
Tam L NguyenInsmed Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ 08807, USA.
Michel R CorbozInsmed Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ 08807, USA.
Vladimir S MalininInsmed Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ 08807, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6496-2968
David C CipollaInsmed Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ 08807, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5773-4721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the inhalation route has been used for millennia for pharmacologic effect, the biological barriers to treating lung disease created real challenges for the pharmaceutical industry until sophisticated device and formulation technologies emerged over the past fifty years. There are now several inhaled device technologies that enable delivery of therapeutics at high efficiency to the lung and avoid excessive deposition in the oropharyngeal region. Chemistry and formulation technologies have also emerged to prolong retention of drug at the active site by overcoming degradation and clearance mechanisms, or by reducing the rate of systemic absorption. These technologies have also been utilized to improve tolerability or to facilitate uptake within cells when there are intracellular targets. This paper describes the biological barriers and provides recent examples utilizing formulation technologies or drug chemistry modifications to overcome those barriers.

Indexed as

inhaled drug deliveryliposome formulationprodrug

Identifiers

PMID35214039
PMCPMC8880668

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.