Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35219177›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2022

Probing immune infiltration dynamics in cancer by in vivo imaging.

Thomas S C Ng, Harris H Allen, Mohammad Rashidian, Miles A Miller

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Applications of Intravital Imaging in Cancer Immunotherapy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Imaging of Extravasation of Splenocytes in the Dorsal Skinfold Window Chamber.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas S C NgCenter for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, 185 Cambridge St, Boston, MA 02114, United States; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Harris H AllenDepartment of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Mohammad RashidianDepartment of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Miles A MillerCenter for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital Research Institute, 185 Cambridge St, Boston, MA 02114, United States; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, United States. Electronic address: Miles.miller@mgh.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Dissection of in situ myeloid signaling using image-guided synthetic controlDP2CA259675 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MILLER, MILES A · 2020 to 2023
$2.7M
Single Cell In Vivo Imaging Technology to Analyze Taxane Nano Formulations in Breast CancerR00CA207744 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MILLER, MILES A · 2018 to 2020
$747k
Noninvasive monitoring and evaluation of anti-tumor responses as a predictive toolK22CA226040 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI RASHIDIAN, MOHAMMAD · 2019 to 2021
$574k
NCI NIH HHS DP2 CA259675NCI NIH HHS K22 CA226040NCI NIH HHS R00 CA207744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapies typically aim to stimulate the accumulation and activity of cytotoxic T-cells or pro-inflammatory antigen-presenting cells, reduce immunosuppressive myeloid cells or regulatory T-cells, or elicit some combination of effects thereof. Notwithstanding the encouraging results, immunotherapies such as PD-1/PD-L1-targeted immune checkpoint blockade act heterogeneously across individual patients. It remains challenging to predict and monitor individual responses, especially across multiple sites of metastasis or sites of potential toxicity. To address this need, in vivo imaging of both adaptive and innate immune cell populations has emerged as a tool to quantify spatial leukocyte accumulation in tumors non-invasively. Here we review recent progress in the translational development of probes for in vivo leukocyte imaging, focusing on complementary perspectives provided by imaging of T-cells, phagocytic macrophages, and their responses to therapy.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentAntigen-Presenting CellsHumansImmunotherapyT-LymphocytesAdoptive cell therapyIntravital microscopyMagnetic resonance imagingPositron emission tomographyTumor associated macrophagesTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID35219177
PMCPMC9118268
OpenAlexW4213413618

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.