Evidence mapPaperPMID 35222698Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2022

Impact of metabolic disorders on endometrial receptivity in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Can Wang, Yang-Xing Wen, Qing-Yun Mai

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Can WangReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, P.R. China.
Yang-Xing WenReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, P.R. China.
Qing-Yun MaiReproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, P.R. China.
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigated the expression of endometrial receptivity-related molecules in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and different androgen status, insulin resistance (IR) levels, and body mass indexes (BMI) to identify the mechanism underlying their effects on pregnancy outcomes. The present study recruited 43 participants from November 2020 to January 2021, which were classified into five groups: i) Hyperandrogenemia (HA) combined with impaired glucose tolerance group (n=8); ii) HA combined with diabetes mellitus group (n=8); iii) HA combined with non-IR (NIR) group (n=10); iv) non-HA (NHA) androgen combined with IR group (n=8); and v) NHA combined with NIR group (n=9). In addition, according to their BMIs, patients were sub-grouped into lean/normal (n=27), overweight (n=8) or obese (n=8) groups. The mRNA expression levels of endometrial receptivity-related molecules were detected using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. In addition, flow cytometry was used to determine the phenotype and percentage of uterine natural killer cells (uNK). According to the results, patients with PCOS and IR status, HA and obesity (BMI ≥24 kg/m

Indexed as

endometrial receptivityhyperandrogen statusinsulin resistanceobesitypolycystic ovary syndrome

Identifiers

PMID35222698
PMCPMC8812101
OpenAlexW4210846880

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.