ArticlePlant physiology2022
Updates on gene editing and its applications.
Article in Plant physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision engineering of upstream open reading frames for translational regulation and crop improvement.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- Suppression of plastid-to-nucleus gene transfer by DNA double-strand break repair.Nature plants · 2025Article
- Review
- From qualitative to quantitative: the state of the art and challenges for plant synthetic biology.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2023Review
- Multiplex Editing of theThe CRISPR journal · 2023Article
- ImprovingGenes · 2023Article
- Improving abiotic stress tolerance of forage grasses - prospects of using genome editing.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Integrating CRISPR/Cas systems with programmable DNA nanostructures for delivery and beyond.iScience · 2022Review
- Research Advances and Prospects of Orphan Genes in Plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Enabling Genome Editing for Enhanced Agricultural Sustainability.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.