Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35230682›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Somatic and Germline Variant Calling from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.

Ti-Cheng Chang, Ke Xu, Zhongshan Cheng, Gang Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ti-Cheng Chang *Center for Applied Bioinformatics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. ti-cheng.chang@stjude.org.
Ke Xu *Center for Applied Bioinformatics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Zhongshan ChengCenter for Applied Bioinformatics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Gang WuCenter for Applied Bioinformatics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Re-sequencing of the human genome by next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been widely applied to discover pathogenic genetic variants and/or causative genes accounting for various types of diseases including cancers. The advances in NGS have allowed the sequencing of the entire genome of patients and identification of disease-associated variants in a reasonable timeframe and cost. The core of the variant identification relies on accurate variant calling and annotation. Numerous algorithms have been developed to elucidate the repertoire of somatic and germline variants. Each algorithm has its own distinct strengths, weaknesses, and limitations due to the difference in the statistical modeling approach adopted and read information utilized. Accurate variant calling remains challenging due to the presence of sequencing artifacts and read misalignments. All of these can lead to the discordance of the variant calling results and even misinterpretation of the discovery. For somatic variant detection, multiple factors including chromosomal abnormalities, tumor heterogeneity, tumor-normal cross contaminations, unbalanced tumor/normal sample coverage, and variants with low allele frequencies add even more layers of complexity to accurate variant identification. Given the discordances and difficulties, ensemble approaches have emerged by harmonizing information from different algorithms to improve variant calling performance. In this chapter, we first introduce the general scheme of variant calling algorithms and potential challenges at distinct stages. We next review the existing workflows of variant calling and annotation, and finally explore the strategies deployed by different callers as well as their strengths and caveats. Overall, NGS-based variant identification with careful consideration allows reliable detection of pathogenic variant and candidate variant selection for precision medicine.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAlgorithmsGerm CellsHumansModels, StatisticalSoftwareContaminationEnsemble variant callingGermline variantLow-frequency variantsMachine learningNext-generation sequencingSingle-cell sequencingSomatic variantThird-generation sequencingTumor-only variant callingVariant annotationVariant callingVariant prioritization

Identifiers

PMID35230682

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.