ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022
Somatic and Germline Variant Calling from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-Species Exome Sequencing Reveals Recurrent Genomic Alterations in California Sea Lion (Genes · 2026Article
- Genetic landscape of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia in Taiwan.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- The Role of Algorithms in Molecular Tumour Boards-Managing the Gap Between Research and Clinic in Precision Medicine.Sociology of health & illness · 2025Article
- Genomic alterations in normal breast tissues preceding breast cancer diagnosis.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Patient-derived organoid-guided precision therapy for a very young woman with multidrug-resistant metastatic breast cancer: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence applied in neoantigen identification facilitates personalized cancer immunotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Re-sequencing of the human genome by next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been widely applied to discover pathogenic genetic variants and/or causative genes accounting for various types of diseases including cancers. The advances in NGS have allowed the sequencing of the entire genome of patients and identification of disease-associated variants in a reasonable timeframe and cost. The core of the variant identification relies on accurate variant calling and annotation. Numerous algorithms have been developed to elucidate the repertoire of somatic and germline variants. Each algorithm has its own distinct strengths, weaknesses, and limitations due to the difference in the statistical modeling approach adopted and read information utilized. Accurate variant calling remains challenging due to the presence of sequencing artifacts and read misalignments. All of these can lead to the discordance of the variant calling results and even misinterpretation of the discovery. For somatic variant detection, multiple factors including chromosomal abnormalities, tumor heterogeneity, tumor-normal cross contaminations, unbalanced tumor/normal sample coverage, and variants with low allele frequencies add even more layers of complexity to accurate variant identification. Given the discordances and difficulties, ensemble approaches have emerged by harmonizing information from different algorithms to improve variant calling performance. In this chapter, we first introduce the general scheme of variant calling algorithms and potential challenges at distinct stages. We next review the existing workflows of variant calling and annotation, and finally explore the strategies deployed by different callers as well as their strengths and caveats. Overall, NGS-based variant identification with careful consideration allows reliable detection of pathogenic variant and candidate variant selection for precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35230682What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.