ArticleActa biomaterialia2022
Proteomic, mechanical, and biochemical characterization of cartilage development.
Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Smart functionalized cartilage repair microspheres: Concepts and applications.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Localisation-Dependent Variations in Articular Cartilage ECM: Implications for Tissue Engineering and Cartilage Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Characterization of the Age-Related Differences in Porcine Acetabulum and Femoral Head Articular Cartilage.Cartilage · 2025Article
- Fibrocartilage hyalinization: A potential therapeutic strategy for articular fibrocartilage.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
- Establishment and characterization of an inflammatory cartilaginous organoids model for organoid transplantation study.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
- Tissue stiffness heterogeneity in the jaw and temporomandibular joint: its impact on tumor metabolism and considerations forFrontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Exogenous Collagen Crosslinking is Highly Detrimental to Articular Cartilage Lubrication.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2024Article
- Combining bioengineered human skin with bioprinted cartilage for ear reconstruction.Science advances · 2023Article
- Tissue anisotropy and collagenomics in porcine penile tunica albuginea: Implications for penile structure-function relationships and tissue engineering.Acta biomaterialia · 2023Article
- Proteomic, mechanical, and biochemical development of tissue-engineered neocartilage.Biomaterials research · 2022Article
- Regeneration of articular cartilage defects: Therapeutic strategies and perspectives.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this work is to examine the development of porcine cartilage by analyzing its mechanical properties, biochemical content, and proteomics at different developmental stages. Cartilage from the knees of fetal, neonatal, juvenile, and mature pigs was analyzed using histology, mechanical testing, biochemical assays, fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis, and bottom-up proteomics. Mature cartilage has 2.2-times the collagen per dry weight of fetal cartilage, and fetal cartilage has 2.1-times and 17.9-times the glycosaminoglycan and DNA per dry weight of mature cartilage, respectively. Tensile and compressive properties peak in the juvenile stage, with a tensile modulus 4.7-times that of neonatal. Proteomics analysis reveals increases in collagen types II and III, while collagen types IX, XI, and XIV, and aggrecan decrease with age. For example, collagen types IX and XI decrease 9.4-times and 5.1-times, respectively from fetal to mature. Mechanical and biochemical measurements have their greatest developmental changes between the neonatal and juvenile stages, where mechanotransduction plays a major role. Bottom-up proteomics serves as a powerful tool for tissue characterization, showing results beyond those of routine biochemical analysis. For example, proteomic analysis shows significant drops in collagen types IX, XI, and XIV throughout development, which shows insight into the permanence of cartilage's matrix. Changes in overall glycosaminoglycan content compared to aggrecan and link protein indicate non-enzymatic degradation of aggrecan structures or hyaluronan in mature cartilage. In addition to tissue characterization, bottom-up proteomics techniques are critical in tissue engineering efforts toward repair or regeneration of cartilage in animal models. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: In this study, the development of porcine articular cartilage is interrogated through biomechanical, biochemical, and proteomic techniques, to determine how mechanics and extracellular matrix composition change from fetal to mature cartilage. For the first time, a bottom-up proteomics approach is used to reveal a wide variety of protein changes through aging; for example, the collagen subtype composition of the cartilage increases in collagen types II and III, and decreases in collagen types IX, XI, and XIV. This analysis shows that bottom-up proteomics is a critical tool in tissue characterization, especially toward developing a deeper understanding of matrix composition and development in tissue engineering studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.