Evidence mapPaperPMID 35237446Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2022

Muscle-Strengthening Exercise Questionnaire (MSEQ): an assessment of concurrent validity and test-retest reliability.

Jane Shakespear-Druery, Katrien De Cocker, Stuart J H Biddle, Jason Bennie

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07702461 (Determination of Resistance Training Status for Patients on Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07702461 recruitingstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Determination of Resistance Training Status for Patients on Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists

Ran2026Enrolled300Registered outcomes2Posted comparisons0ConditionsDiabetes (DM), Obesity & OverweightArmsGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonist (GLP-1)
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cohort Profile: The Nijmegen Exercise Study (NES).International journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Changes in physical activity since cancer diagnosis and associations with health-related quality of life: a study of adults living with advanced cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jane Shakespear-DrueryPhysically Active Lifestyles Research Group (USQ-PALs), Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4111-6494
Katrien De CockerPhysically Active Lifestyles Research Group (USQ-PALs), Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7510-4419
Stuart J H BiddlePhysically Active Lifestyles Research Group (USQ-PALs), Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7663-6895
Jason BenniePhysically Active Lifestyles Research Group (USQ-PALs), Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8668-8998

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMuscle-strengthening exercise (MSE) has multiple independent health benefits and is a component of global physical activity guidelines. However, the assessment of MSE in health surveillance is often limited to the constructs of frequency (days/week), with little focus on constructs such as MSE type, muscle groups targeted and intensity. This study describes the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the Muscle-Strengthening Exercise Questionnaire (MSEQ), which was developed to assess multiple MSE participation constructs.

methodsThe MSEQ was developed to assess the weekly frequency, session duration and intensity, types of MSE (eg, weight machines, bodyweight exercise) and muscle groups targeted. Two convenience samples of adult participants were recruited. Test-retest reliability was completed online by 85 participants. Concurrent validity was assessed for 54 participants using an online 7-day MSE log.

resultsThe MSEQ shows high test-retest reliability for frequency, duration and level of intensity for each of the four MSE types (using weight machines, bodyweight exercises, resistance exercises and holistic exercises), and for the four types combined (ρ range 0.76-0.91). For muscle groups targeted, the reliability ranged mostly from moderate-to-substantial for each of the four MSE types (κ range 0.44-0.78) and fair-to-moderate for the four types combined (κ range 0.35-0.51). Concurrent validity for frequency, duration and level of intensity for each of the four MSE types, and the four types combined, was moderate-to-high (ρ range 0.30-0.77).

conclusionThe MSEQ shows acceptable reliability and validity for four key MSE constructs. This new MSEQ survey instrument could be used to assess adults' MSE.

Indexed as

epidemiologyphysical activitypublic healthquestionnairesurveillance

Identifiers

PMID35237446
PMCPMC8845318

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.