Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35237939›Full record

SynthesisUpdates in surgery2022

The role of artificial intelligence in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review.

D Schlanger, F Graur, C Popa, E Moiș, N Al Hajjar

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Updates in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D Schlanger"Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania street Emil Isac no 13, 400023, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
F Graur"Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania street Emil Isac no 13, 400023, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. graurf@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5887-3408
C Popa"Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania street Emil Isac no 13, 400023, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
E Moiș"Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania street Emil Isac no 13, 400023, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
N Al Hajjar"Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania street Emil Isac no 13, 400023, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca 1032/60/13 January 2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML), is being slowly incorporated in medical practice, to provide a more precise and personalized approach. Pancreatic surgery is an evolving field, which offers the only curative option for patients with pancreatic cancer. Increasing amounts of data are available in medicine: AI and ML can help incorporate large amounts of information in clinical practice. We conducted a systematic review, based on PRISMA criteria, of studies that explored the use of AI or ML algorithms in pancreatic surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review on this topic. Twenty-five eligible studies were included in this review; 12 studies with implications in the preoperative diagnosis, while 13 studies had implications in patient evolution. Preoperative diagnosis, such as predicting the malignancy of IPMNs, differential diagnosis between pancreatic cystic lesions, classification of different pancreatic tumours, and establishment of the correct management for each of these lesions, can be facilitated through different AI or ML algorithms. Postoperative evolution can also be predicted, and some studies reported prediction models for complications, including postoperative pancreatic fistula, while other studies have analysed the implications for prognosis evaluation (from predicting a textbook outcome, the risk of metastasis or relapse, or the mortality rate and survival). One study discussed the possibility of predicting an intraoperative complication-massive intraoperative bleeding. Artificial intelligence and machine learning models have promising applications in pancreatic surgery, in the preoperative period (high-accuracy diagnosis) and postoperative setting (prognosis evaluation and complication prediction), and the intraoperative applications have been less explored.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePancreatic NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningPancreatic FistulaArtificial intelligenceMachine learningPancreatic surgeryPrecision medicine

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.