ReviewCurrent oncology reports2022
Global Longitudinal Strain Monitoring to Guide Cardioprotective Medications During Anthracycline Treatment.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discordance between left ventricular ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain during routine cardio-oncology surveillance.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2026Observational
- External validation of machine learning models predicting global longitudinal strain from conventional echocardiography in patients with cancer.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Cardiotoxicity of Targeted Therapies in Hematologic Malignancies: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Management.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction: Pooled Incidence of Subclinical and Clinical Presentations Using Multimodal Multi-Parametric Imaging-A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Patterns of Hemodialysis-Induced Acute Global Longitudinal Strain Deterioration and Their Predictors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostics in cardio-oncology: a focus on anthracyclines.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Anthracycline-induced cardiorenal toxicity: from molecular mechanisms to clinical management.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Review
- Effect of Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation on Cardiac Function and Quality of Life in Patients with Heart Failure: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning for cardio-oncology: predicting global longitudinal strain from conventional echocardiographic measurements in cancer patients.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Effect of cyclophospamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone/prednisolone (CHOP) chemotherapy regimens on left ventricular systolic function and cardiac structural abnormalities in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Impact of antihypertensive treatment on myocardial mechanics in elderly hypertensive patients with different left ventricular geometry patterns: a two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Usefulness of Longitudinal Strain to Assess Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Myocarditis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Racial Disparity in Anthracycline-induced Cardiotoxicity in Breast Cancer Patients.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Global Longitudinal Strain in Cardio-Oncology: A Review.Cancers · 2023Review
- Supervised exercise training in patients with cancer during anthracycline-based chemotherapy to mitigate cardiotoxicity: a randomized-controlled-trial.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of the reviewAnthracycline chemotherapy carries a risk of myocardial dysfunction and heart failure even at relatively low doses, and the clinical prediction of cancer treatment-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is inexact. Careful imaging or biomarker surveillance during chemotherapy can identify CTRCD before the development of heart failure. Currently, this surveillance is performed using ejection fraction (EF). While this is a reliable and reproducible test with three-dimensional techniques, the most widely used imaging technique is two-dimensional echocardiography, for which EF measurements have broad confidence intervals. RECENT
findingsThe use of global myocardial strain (GLS) provides a more reliable and reproducible means of assessing global cardiac function and shows meaningful changes before a significant change of EF. Observational studies have shown that although absolute measurements of GLS, both at baseline and during therapy, are predictive of CTRCD risk, the most reliable approach is to assess the change of GLS with therapy - a meaningful relative change of 10-15% being significant. A clinical trial comparing GLS to EF surveillance did not show a significant change of EF in the overall study group, but did show that patients managed with a the GLS-guided approach were less likely to develop a meaningful change of cardiac function to an abnormal level. In at-risk patients, there is good evidence for the protective value of neurohormonal antagonists and statins: the use of GLS enables these benefits to be directed to those most likely to benefit, while minimizing their use in the majority of people, who do not need them. Although GLS requires an element of training and efforts to ensure uniformity, it has proven to be a feasible, robust, and reproducible technique, ready for wide adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.