Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35244161›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2022

XSim version 2: simulation of modern breeding programs.

Chunpeng James Chen, Dorian Garrick, Rohan Fernando, Emre Karaman, Chris Stricker, Michael Keehan, Hao Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bridging tradition and innovation: a review of computer simulations in plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ChromaX: a fast and scalable breeding program simulator.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Chunpeng James ChenDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2018-0702
Dorian GarrickMassey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8640-5372
Rohan FernandoDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5821-099X
Emre KaramanCenter for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8830, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1010-683X
Chris Strickeragn Genetics GmbH, Davos-Dorf, Graubünden 7260, Switzerland.
Michael KeehanMassey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5607-7347
Hao ChengDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5146-7231
Massey University · NZUniversity of California, Davis · USAarhus University · DKIowa State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulation can be an efficient approach to design, evaluate, and optimize breeding programs. In the era of modern agriculture, breeding programs can benefit from a simulator that integrates various sources of big data and accommodates state-of-the-art statistical models. The initial release of XSim, in which stochastic descendants can be efficiently simulated with a drop-down strategy, has mainly been used to validate genomic selection results. In this article, we present XSim Version 2 that is an open-source tool and has been extensively redesigned with additional features to meet the needs in modern breeding programs. It seamlessly incorporates multiple statistical models for genetic evaluations, such as GBLUP, Bayesian alphabets, and neural networks, and it can effortlessly simulate successive generations of descendants based on complex mating schemes by the aid of its modular design. Case studies are presented to demonstrate the flexibility of XSim Version 2 in simulating crossbreeding in animal and plant populations. Modern biotechnology, including double haploids and embryo transfer, can all be simultaneously integrated into the mating plans that drive the simulation. From a computing perspective, XSim Version 2 is implemented in Julia, which is a computer language that retains the readability of scripting languages (e.g. R and Python) without sacrificing much computational speed compared to compiled languages (e.g. C). This makes XSim Version 2 a simulation tool that is relatively easy for both champions and community members to maintain, modify, or extend in order to improve their breeding programs. Functions and operators are overloaded for a better user interface so they may concatenate, subset, summarize, and organize simulated populations at each breeding step. With the strong and foreseeable demands in the community, XSim Version 2 will serve as a modern simulator bridging the gaps between theories and experiments with its flexibility, extensibility, and friendly interface.

Indexed as

GenomicsReproductionAnimalsBayes TheoremComputer SimulationModels, Geneticbreeding programsgenetic evaluationsimulation

Identifiers

PMID35244161
PMCPMC8982375
OpenAlexW4214940776

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.