Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35252829›Full record

ArticleCJC open2022

The Anti-Coronavirus Therapies (ACT) Trials: Design, Baseline Characteristics, and Challenges.

John Eikelboom, Sumathy Rangarajan, Sanjit S Jolly, Emilie P Belley-Cote, Richard Whitlock, Heather Beresh, Gayle Lewis, Lizhen Xu, Noel Chan, Shrikant Bangdiwala and 25 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

John EikelboomPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sumathy RangarajanPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sanjit S JollyPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Emilie P Belley-CotePopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Richard WhitlockPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Heather BereshPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Gayle LewisPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lizhen XuPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Noel ChanPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Shrikant BangdiwalaPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Rafael DiazECLA (Estudios Clínicos Latino America), ICR (Instituto Cardiovascular de Rosario), Rosario, Argentina.
Andres OrlandiniECLA (Estudios Clínicos Latino America), ICR (Instituto Cardiovascular de Rosario), Rosario, Argentina.
Mohamed HassanyNational Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt.
Wadea M TarhuniDepartment of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
A M YusufaliHatta Hospital, Dubai Medical College, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Sanjib Kumar SharmaBP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.
Anna KontsevayaNational Medical Research Centre for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Patricio Lopez-JaramilloMasira Research Institute, Medical School, Universidad de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Alvaro AvezumInternational Research Centre, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil.
Antonio L DansUniversity of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Sean WassermanWellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Institute for Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Camilo FelixFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad UTE, Quito, Ecuador.
Khawar KazmiNational Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Rafique Shaheed Road, Karachi, Pakistan.
Prem PaisSt. John's Research Institute, Bangalore, India.
Denis XavierSt. John's Medical College and research Institute, Bangalore, India.
Renato D LopesDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Otavio BerwangerGlobal Cardiovascular Coalition, Alameda Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Menelas NkeshimanaCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali, Kigali, Rwanda.
William HarperDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Mark LoebDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Shurjeel ChoudhriMedical & Scientific Affairs, Bayer Inc. Pharmaceuticals, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Michael E FarkouhPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jackie BoschPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sonia S AnandPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Salim YusufPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Effective treatments for COVID-19 are urgently needed, but conducting randomized trials during the pandemic has been challenging. Methods: The Anti-Coronavirus Therapy (ACT) trials are parallel factorial international trials that aimed to enroll 3500 outpatients and 2500 inpatients with symptomatic COVID-19. The outpatient trial is evaluating colchicine vs usual care, and aspirin vs usual care. The primary outcome for the colchicine randomization is hospitalization or death, and for the aspirin randomization, it is major thrombosis, hospitalization, or death. The inpatient trial is evaluating colchicine vs usual care, and the combination of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily and aspirin 100 mg once daily vs usual care. The primary outcome for the colchicine randomization is need for high-flow oxygen, need for mechanical ventilation, or death, and for the rivaroxaban plus aspirin randomization, it is major thrombotic events, need for high-flow oxygen, need for mechanical ventilation, or death. Results: At the completion of enrollment on February 10, 2022, the outpatient trial had enrolled 3917 patients, and the inpatient trial had enrolled 2611 patients. Challenges encountered included lack of preliminary data about the interventions under evaluation, uncertainties related to the expected event rates, delays in regulatory and ethics approvals, and in obtaining study interventions, as well as the changing pattern of the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: The ACT trials will determine the efficacy of anti-inflammatory therapy with colchicine, and antithrombotic therapy with aspirin given alone or in combination with rivaroxaban, across the spectrum of mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19. Lessons learned from the conduct of these trials will inform planning of future trials.

Identifiers

PMID35252829
PMCPMC8887957

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.