Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35263267›Full record

ReviewNeurology2022

Neuromodulation in 2035: The Neurology Future Forecasting Series.

Tim Denison, Martha J Morrell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06515132 (Efficacy and Safety of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06515132 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness: A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trail

TypeinterventionalSponsorHuashan HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsDisorder of Consciousness, Spinal Cord StimulationArmsSCS Stimulation, Sham Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. [Progresses on temporal interference electromagnetic stimulation for non-invasive deep brain function modulation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Stimulating discussion: neuromodulation for migraine in pregnancy.Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tim DenisonFrom the Department of Engineering Science (T.D.), University of Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (M.J.M), Stanford University, CA; and NeuroPace (M.J.M), Mountain View, CA.
Martha J MorrellFrom the Department of Engineering Science (T.D.), University of Oxford, UK; Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences (M.J.M), Stanford University, CA; and NeuroPace (M.J.M), Mountain View, CA. mmorrell@neuropace.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromodulation devices are approved in the United States for the treatment of movement disorders, epilepsy, pain, and depression, and are used off-label for other neurologic indications. By 2035, advances in our understanding of neuroanatomical networks and in the mechanism of action of stimulation, coupled with developments in material science, miniaturization, energy storage, and delivery, will expand the use of neuromodulation devices. Neuromodulation approaches are flexible and modifiable. Stimulation can be targeted to a dysfunctional brain focus, region, or network, and can be delivered as a single treatment, continuously, according to a duty cycle, or in response to physiologic changes. Programming can be titrated and modified based on the clinical response or a physiologic biomarker. In addition to keeping pace with clinical and technological developments, neurologists in 2035 will need to navigate complex ethical and economic considerations to ensure access to neuromodulation technology for a rapidly expanding population of patients. This article provides an overview of systems in use today and those that are anticipated and highlights the opportunities and challenges for the future, some of which are technical, but most of which will be addressed by learning about brain networks, and from rapidly growing experience with neuromodulation devices.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesElectric Stimulation TherapyEpilepsyNeurologyBrainHumans

Identifiers

PMID35263267
PMCPMC8762584

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.