ArticleScientific reports2022
Evolutionary genomic relationships and coupling in MK-STYX and STYX pseudophosphatases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- STYXL1 regulates CCT complex assembly and flagellar tubulin folding in sperm formation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Understanding Pseudophosphatase Function Through Biochemical Interactions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- The DUSP domain of pseudophosphatase MK-STYX interacts with G3BP1 to decrease stress granules.Archives of biochemistry and biophysics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The dual specificity phosphatase (DUSP) family has catalytically inactive members, called pseudophosphatases. They have mutations in their catalytic motifs that render them enzymatically inactive. This study analyzes the significance of two pseudophosphatases, MK-STYX [MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphoserine/threonine/tyrosine-binding protein]) and STYX (serine/threonine/tyrosine-interacting protein), throughout their evolution and provides measurements and comparison of their evolutionary conservation. Phylogenetic trees were constructed to show any deviation from various species evolutionary paths. Data was collected on a large set of proteins that have either one of the two domains of MK-STYX, the DUSP domain or the cdc-25 homology (CH2) /rhodanese-like domain. The distance between species pairs for MK-STYX or STYX and Ka/Ks ratio were calculated. In addition, both pseudophosphatases were ranked among a large set of related proteins, including the active homologs of MK-STYX, MKP (MAPK phosphatase)-1 and MKP-3. MK-STYX had one of the highest species-species protein distances and was under weaker purifying selection pressure than most proteins with its domains. In contrast, the protein distances of STYX were lower than 82% of the DUSP-containing proteins and was under one of the strongest purifying selection pressures. However, there was similar selection pressure on the N-terminal sequences of MK-STYX, STYX, MKP-1, and MKP-3. We next perform statistical coupling analysis, a process that reveals interconnected regions within the proteins. We find that while MKP-1,-3, and STYX all have 2 functional units (sectors), MK-STYX only has one, and that MK-STYX is similar to MKP-3 in the evolutionary coupling of the active site and KIM domain. Within those two domains, the mean coupling is also most similar for MK-STYX and MKP-3. This study reveals striking distinctions between the evolutionary patterns of MK-STYX and STYX, suggesting a very specific role for each pseudophosphatase, further highlighting the relevance of these atypical members of DUSP as signaling regulators. Therefore, our study provides computational evidence and evolutionary reasons to further explore the properties of pseudophosphatases, in particular MK-STYX and STYX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.