Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35266751›Full record

ReviewThe American psychologist2021

Socioeconomic disparities and neuroplasticity: Moving toward adaptation, intersectionality, and inclusion.

Kimberly G Noble, Emma R Hart, Jessica F Sperber

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American psychologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Socioeconomic Status Disparities in Children's Cognition-Differences in Degree or Kind?Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly G NobleDepartment of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Emma R HartDepartment of Human Development, Teachers College, Columbia University.ORCID 0000-0003-3808-0838
Jessica F SperberDepartment of Human Development, Teachers College, Columbia University.ORCID 0000-0002-1636-5560
Columbia University · USNeurobehavioral Systems · US

Funding

Household Income and Child Development in the First Years of LifeR01HD087384 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Greg John Duncan, LISA A GENNETIAN · 2017 to 2026
$14.1M
Socioeconomic Disparities in Cognitive and Neural Development in the First 3 yearsR01HD093707 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TEACHERS COLLEGE · PI NOBLE, KIMBERLY G · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD087384NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childhood socioeconomic status (SES) has far-reaching linkages with children's cognitive and socioemotional development, academic achievement, health, and brain structure and function. Rather than focusing on understandings about the neuroscience of socioeconomic inequality that have recently been reviewed elsewhere, the present article reviews several new directions in the field, beginning first with a consideration of the deficit versus adaptation framework. Although scientists largely agree that socioeconomic disparities in brain development are experience-dependent phenomena rooted in neuroplasticity, historically, such differences have been framed as deficits, which may benefit from intervention. However, emerging research suggests that some developmental differences among children experiencing adversity may alternatively be considered context-appropriate adaptations to the individual's environment. We next discuss how socioeconomic circumstances are inextricably intertwined with race, and consider how measurement of racism and discrimination must be part of a full understanding of the neuroscience of socioeconomic inequality. We argue that scientists must consciously recruit racially and socioeconomically diverse samples-and include measures of SES, race, and discrimination in analyses-to promote a more complete understanding of the neuroplasticity specifically, and psychological science more broadly. We discuss the extent to which researcher and editor positionality have contributed to these problems historically, and conclude by considering paths forward. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Intersectional FrameworkRacismChildEducational StatusHumansNeuronal PlasticitySocial ClassSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID35266751
PMCPMC9092317
OpenAlexW4226217639

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.