Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35269502›Full record

ReviewCells2022

Role of the Circadian Clock "Death-Loop" in the DNA Damage Response Underpinning Cancer Treatment Resistance.

Ninel Miriam Vainshelbaum, Kristine Salmina, Bogdan I Gerashchenko, Marija Lazovska, Pawel Zayakin, Mark Steven Cragg, Dace Pjanova, Jekaterina Erenpreisa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Circadian clock and cancer.Military Medical Research · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Spatial-Temporal Genome Regulation in Stress-Response and Cell-Fate Change.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Life Entrapped in a Network of Atavistic Attractors: How to Find a Rescue.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ninel Miriam VainshelbaumCancer Research Division, Latvian Biomedicine Research and Study Centre, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.
Kristine SalminaCancer Research Division, Latvian Biomedicine Research and Study Centre, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.
Bogdan I GerashchenkoR.E. Kavetsky Institute of Experimental Pathology, Oncology and Radiobiology, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 03022 Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0001-6404-2320
Marija LazovskaCancer Research Division, Latvian Biomedicine Research and Study Centre, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.
Pawel ZayakinCancer Research Division, Latvian Biomedicine Research and Study Centre, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-5336-3484
Mark Steven CraggCentre for Cancer Immunology, School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Dace PjanovaCancer Research Division, Latvian Biomedicine Research and Study Centre, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-3993-7939
Jekaterina ErenpreisaCancer Research Division, Latvian Biomedicine Research and Study Centre, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-2870-7775
Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre · LVNational Academy of Sciences of Ukraine · UAUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

European Regional Development Fund 1.1.1.1/18/A/099European Regional Development Fund 1.1.1.2/VIAA/3/19/463University of Latvia Foundation's PhD Student Scholarship in the Natural and Life Sciences Ninel Miriam Vainshelbaum
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we review the role of the circadian clock (CC) in the resistance of cancer cells to genotoxic treatments in relation to whole-genome duplication (WGD) and telomere-length regulation. The CC drives the normal cell cycle, tissue differentiation, and reciprocally regulates telomere elongation. However, it is deregulated in embryonic stem cells (ESCs), the early embryo, and cancer. Here, we review the DNA damage response of cancer cells and a similar impact on the cell cycle to that found in ESCs—overcoming G1/S, adapting DNA damage checkpoints, tolerating DNA damage, coupling telomere erosion to accelerated cell senescence, and favouring transition by mitotic slippage into the ploidy cycle (reversible polyploidy). Polyploidy decelerates the CC. We report an intriguing positive correlation between cancer WGD and the deregulation of the CC assessed by bioinformatics on 11 primary cancer datasets (rho = 0.83; p < 0.01). As previously shown, the cancer cells undergoing mitotic slippage cast off telomere fragments with TERT, restore the telomeres by ALT-recombination, and return their depolyploidised offspring to telomerase-dependent regulation. By reversing this polyploidy and the CC “death loop”, the mitotic cycle and Hayflick limit count are thus again renewed. Our review and proposed mechanism support a life-cycle concept of cancer and highlight the perspective of cancer treatment by differentiation.

Indexed as

Circadian ClocksNeoplasmsDNA DamageHumansMitosisPolyploidyTelomerecancer resistancecell cyclecircadian clock (CC)DNA damage response (DDR)genotoxic treatmentsHayflick limitreprogrammingreversible polyploidysenescencetelomeres

Identifiers

PMID35269502
PMCPMC8909334
OpenAlexW4214845378

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.