Evidence mapPaperPMID 35277354Full record

ArticleTransfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis2022

Using automation to manage donor engagement and fine-tune supply and demand during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Theresa Pina, Marc Lewis, Charity Garrison, Anna Razatos

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Theresa PinaGulf Coast Regional Blood Center, 1400 La Concha Ln, Houston, TX 77054, USA. Electronic address: tpina@giveblood.org.
Marc LewisGulf Coast Regional Blood Center, 1400 La Concha Ln, Houston, TX 77054, USA. Electronic address: mlewis@giveblood.org.
Charity GarrisonTerumo Blood and Cell Technologies, 10811 West Collins Ave Lakewood, CO 80215, USA. Electronic address: charity.garrison@terumobct.com.
Anna RazatosTerumo Blood and Cell Technologies, 10811 West Collins Ave Lakewood, CO 80215, USA. Electronic address: anna.razatos@terumobct.com.
Terumo (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 disrupted blood center operations starting March 2020 and continues to affect donor presentation and blood availability today. The industry mobilized significant resources to collect COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) to treat COVID-19 patients. At the same time, blood centers continued to collect platelets, plasma, and red blood cells (RBCs) to meet the needs of non-COVID-19 patients. The purpose of this study was to quantify how automation was used to fine-tune supply and demand and increase donor engagement during the first year of the pandemic.

methodsThis was a single-center retrospective study of blood collection and donor presentation at a mid-sized US blood center. Data was evaluated from January 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021. Parameters evaluated included donor presentation, platelets per procedure, concurrent RBC and plasma collections per procedure, operator compliance, total donor appointment count, and donor frequency.

resultsWith the cancelation of mobile blood drives, fixed sites increased total apheresis procedures by 37% and increased turns per bed by 46% whereas less products were collected per donor. By collecting only what was needed, platelet expiration rate decreased from 6.8% (pre-pandemic) to less than 4%. Donor engagement as measured by donor frequency increased from 1.6 in January 2020 to 1.8 in March 2021.

conclusionsUsing technological advances such as automated blood collection and information systems, the blood center improved donor engagement and avoided collecting a surplus of any one type of blood product over the course of the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19AutomationBlood DonorsCOVID-19 SerotherapyHumansImmunization, PassivePandemicsRetrospective StudiesAutomationBlood collection strategyCOVID-19 PandemicDonor engagement

Identifiers

PMID35277354
PMCPMC8897834
OpenAlexW4220960434

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.