Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35286874›Full record

SynthesisComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2022

Supervised and weakly supervised deep learning models for COVID-19 CT diagnosis: A systematic review.

Haseeb Hassan, Zhaoyu Ren, Chengmin Zhou, Muazzam A Khan, Yi Pan, Jian Zhao, Bingding Huang

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Haseeb HassanCollege of Big data and Internet, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, 518118, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, China; College of Applied Sciences, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Zhaoyu RenCollege of Big data and Internet, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, 518118, China.
Chengmin ZhouCollege of Big data and Internet, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, 518118, China.
Muazzam A KhanDepartment of Computer Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Yi PanShenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.
Jian ZhaoCollege of Big data and Internet, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, 518118, China. Electronic address: zhaojian@sztu.edu.cn.
Bingding HuangCollege of Big data and Internet, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, 518118, China. Electronic address: huangbingding@sztu.edu.cn.
Shenzhen Technology University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNQuaid-i-Azam University · PKShenzhen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and computer vision (CV) methods become reliable to extract features from radiological images, aiding COVID-19 diagnosis ahead of the pathogenic tests and saving critical time for disease management and control. Thus, this review article focuses on cascading numerous deep learning-based COVID-19 computerized tomography (CT) imaging diagnosis research, providing a baseline for future research. Compared to previous review articles on the topic, this study pigeon-holes the collected literature very differently (i.e., its multi-level arrangement). For this purpose, 71 relevant studies were found using a variety of trustworthy databases and search engines, including Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus. We classify the selected literature in multi-level machine learning groups, such as supervised and weakly supervised learning. Our review article reveals that weak supervision has been adopted extensively for COVID-19 CT diagnosis compared to supervised learning. Weakly supervised (conventional transfer learning) techniques can be utilized effectively for real-time clinical practices by reusing the sophisticated features rather than over-parameterizing the standard models. Few-shot and self-supervised learning are the recent trends to address data scarcity and model efficacy. The deep learning (artificial intelligence) based models are mainly utilized for disease management and control. Therefore, it is more appropriate for readers to comprehend the related perceptive of deep learning approaches for the in-progress COVID-19 CT diagnosis research.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningArtificial IntelligenceCOVID-19 TestingHumansSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray ComputedCOVID-19 CT deep learningCOVID-19 CT detectionCOVID-19 CT diagnosisSupervised learningWeakly supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID35286874
PMCPMC8897838
OpenAlexW4220686584

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.