Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35288469›Full record

Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2022

Translational randomized phase II trial of cabozantinib in combination with nivolumab in advanced, recurrent, or metastatic endometrial cancer.

Stephanie Lheureux, Daniela E Matei, Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos, Ben X Wang, Ramy Gadalla, Matthew S Block, Andrea Jewell, Stephanie L Gaillard, Michael McHale, Carolyn McCourt and 17 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03367741 (A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Nivolumab in Advanced, Recurrent Metastatic Endometrial Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03367741 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Nivolumab in Advanced, Recurrent Metastatic Endometrial Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2018 to 2027Enrolled82ConditionsAdvanced Endometrial Carcinoma, Metastatic Endometrial Carcinoma, Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma, Stage III Uterine Corpus Carcinoma or Carcinosarcoma AJCC v8ArmsBiopsy Procedure, Biospecimen Collection, Cabozantinib S-malate, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 16 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie LheureuxDrug Development Program, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada stephanie.lheureux@uhn.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4405-5890
Daniela E MateiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Illinois, USA.
Panagiotis A KonstantinopoulosDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ben X WangImmune Profiling Team - Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ramy GadallaImmune Profiling Team - Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew S BlockDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Andrea JewellDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Stephanie L GaillardDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Michael McHaleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moores Cancer Centre, UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California, USA.
Carolyn McCourtDepartment of Gynecology Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Sarah TemkinDepartment of Gynecology Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Eugenia GirdaDepartment of Gynecology Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Floor J BackesDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Theresa L WernerDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Linda DuskaDepartment of Gynecology Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Siobhan KehoeDepartment of Gynecology Oncology, NYU Langone, New York City, New York, USA.
Ilaria ColomboDrug Development Program, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lisa WangDepartment of Statistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Xuan LiDepartment of Statistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rachel WildmanDrug Development Program, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shirin SoleimaniDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Scott LienDrug Development Program, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John WrightInvestigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Trevor PughCancer Genomics Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pamela S OhashiDepartment of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David G BrooksDepartment of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gini F FlemingDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CADana-Farber Cancer Institute · USIndiana University Health · USJohns Hopkins University · USMayo Clinic · USNational Cancer Institute · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USThe Ohio State University · USUC San Diego Health System · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Virginia · USVirginia Commonwealth University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Lila J. Rutten · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
XPO1 inhibitors Selinexor and Eltanexor in Combination with Venetoclax and Decitabine (ASTX727) in AMLUM1CA186709 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI KEITH T FLAHERTY, DONALD W. KUFE · 2014 to 2026
$25.9M
UM1 Supplement for Early Therapeutic Trials with Phase 2 IntentUM1CA186712 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SUSANNE M ARNOLD, WILLIAM E. CARSON · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186709NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombining immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents is a promising treatment strategy in endometrial cancer. To date, no biomarkers for response have been identified and data on post-immunotherapy progression are lacking. We explored the combination of a checkpoint inhibitor (nivolumab) and an antiangiogenic agent (cabozantinib) in immunotherapy-naïve endometrial cancer and in patients whose disease progressed on previous immunotherapy with baseline biopsy for immune profiling. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03367741, registered December 11, 2017), women with recurrent endometrial cancer were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab with cabozantinib (Arm A) or nivolumab alone (Arm B). The primary endpoint was Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors-defined progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with carcinosarcoma or prior immune checkpoint inhibitor received combination treatment (Arm C). Baseline biopsy and serial peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples were analyzed and associations between patient outcome and immune data from cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF) and PBMCs were explored.

resultsMedian PFS was 5.3 (90% CI 3.5 to 9.2) months in Arm A (n=36) and 1.9 (90% CI 1.6 to 3.4) months in Arm B (n=18) (HR=0.59, 90% CI 0.35 to 0.98; log-rank p=0.09, meeting the prespecified statistical significance criteria). The most common treatment-related adverse events in Arm A were diarrhea (50%) and elevated liver enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase 47%, alanine aminotransferase 42%). In-depth baseline CyTOF analysis across treatment arms (n=40) identified 35 immune-cell subsets. Among immunotherapy-pretreated patients in Arm C, non-progressors had significantly higher proportions of activated tissue-resident (CD103+CD69+) ɣδ T cells than progressors (adjusted p=0.009).

conclusionsAdding cabozantinib to nivolumab significantly improved outcomes in heavily pretreated endometrial cancer. A subgroup of immunotherapy-pretreated patients identified by baseline immune profile and potentially benefiting from combination with antiangiogenics requires further investigation.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsNivolumabAnilidesFemaleHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearPyridinesAnilidescabozantinibNivolumabPyridinesbiomarkersclinical trialscombinationdrug therapyfemalegenital neoplasmsimmunotherapyphase II as topictumor

Identifiers

PMID35288469
PMCPMC8921950
OpenAlexW4220847549

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.