Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35289370›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022

Understanding enterprise data warehouses to support clinical and translational research: enterprise information technology relationships, data governance, workforce, and cloud computing.

Boyd M Knosp, Catherine K Craven, David A Dorr, Elmer V Bernstam, Thomas R Campion

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A maturity model for Clinical Trials Management Ecosystem.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Research data warehouse best practices: catalyzing national data sharing through informatics innovation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Boyd M KnospRoy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine and the Institute for Clinical & Translational Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Catherine K CravenDivision of Clinical Research Informatics, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
David A DorrDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2318-7261
Elmer V BernstamCenter for Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Thomas R CampionClinical & Translational Science Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7624-769X
Cornell University · USOregon Health & Science University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001873 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2016 to 2025
$99.0M
Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute - The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR002369 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Cynthia D Morris, Christopher G. Slatore · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
Conduits: Mount Sinai Health System Translational Science HubUL1TR004419 · NCATS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Rosalind J Wright · 2022 to 2026
$46.4M
Convalescent Plasma to Limit Coronavirus Associated ComplicationsUL1TR003167 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KARP, DANIEL D, MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2019 to 2023
$45.3M
MSHS Translational Science HubUL1TR001433 · NCATS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI WRIGHT, ROSALIND J · 2015 to 2019
$26.6M
The University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR002537 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HANSEN, MARLAN R, WINOKUR, PATRICIA · 2018 to 2022
$20.0M
CTSA Coordinating Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration (CLIC)U24TR002260 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI OSSIP, DEBORAH J, ZAND, MARTIN S · 2017 to 2021
$19.0M
NCATS NIH HHS U24 TR002260NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001433NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001873NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002369NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002384NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002537NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003167NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR004419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAmong National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs, effective approaches for enterprise data warehouses for research (EDW4R) development, maintenance, and sustainability remain unclear. The goal of this qualitative study was to understand CTSA EDW4R operations within the broader contexts of academic medical centers and technology. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a directed content analysis of transcripts generated from semistructured interviews with informatics leaders from 20 CTSA hubs.

resultsRespondents referred to services provided by health system, university, and medical school information technology (IT) organizations as "enterprise information technology (IT)." Seventy-five percent of respondents stated that the team providing EDW4R service at their hub was separate from enterprise IT; strong relationships between EDW4R teams and enterprise IT were critical for success. Managing challenges of EDW4R staffing was made easier by executive leadership support. Data governance appeared to be a work in progress, as most hubs reported complex and incomplete processes, especially for commercial data sharing. Although nearly all hubs (n = 16) described use of cloud computing for specific projects, only 2 hubs reported using a cloud-based EDW4R. Respondents described EDW4R cloud migration facilitators, barriers, and opportunities. DISCUSSION: Descriptions of approaches to how EDW4R teams at CTSA hubs work with enterprise IT organizations, manage workforces, make decisions about data, and approach cloud computing provide insights for institutions seeking to leverage patient data for research.

conclusionIdentification of EDW4R best practices is challenging, and this study helps identify a breadth of viable options for CTSA hubs to consider when implementing EDW4R services.

Indexed as

Data WarehousingTranslational Research, BiomedicalCloud ComputingHumansInformation TechnologyWorkforceCTSAdata warehouseEHRsecondary use

Identifiers

PMID35289370
PMCPMC8922193
OpenAlexW4220742612

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.