ArticleSpartan medical research journal2022
Time Sequence of Measurement Affects Blood Pressure Level in an African American Cohort.
Article in Spartan medical research journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUncontrolled hypertension can result in severe clinical conditions such as stroke, chronic kidney disease and congestive heart failure, especially in African American populations. To the knowledge of the authors, the effect of time sequence on blood pressure (BP) using an Automated Office Blood Pressure (AOBP) device has not been documented in an African American cohort. The objective of this study was to investigate the possible influence of time sequence of measurement (pre- and post-physician visit) on BP readings in an African American cohort, in the presence or absence of a Medical Assistant (MA) via AOBP monitoring.
methodsA two-phase, single-blinded, non-randomized trial was conducted at MI-based Ascension Providence Hospital with a convenience sample of hypertensive patients. BP readings were taken using both an Omron 907 (Omron Corp., Kyoto, Japan) and a Welch Allyn (WA) Connex Spot Monitor (Welch Allyn, Inc., Skaneateles Falls, NY) AOBP devices. Descriptive statistics were generated, and T-tests were performed.
resultsIn Phase 1, (N = 148), the mean systolic/diastolic readings for the pre-physician visits (141/82 mmHg) were statistically significantly higher than the post-visit readings (134/80 mmHg) (p ≤ 0.02). Post-visit physician readings from either AOBP device did not differ statistically (p = 0.72). In Phase 2 (n = 50), the presence of an MA resulted in significantly higher readings than when an MA was absent, however, the results of Phase 2 also supported the trends for lower BP post-physician visit found in Phase 1.
conclusionBased on the consistency of these results, a post-physician visit AOBP reading, in the presence or absence of an MA, may provide a more accurate BP measurement to determine whether or not to treat hypertension in African American patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.