Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35293657›Full record

ArticleDermatologic therapy2022

Cutaneous adverse reactions to coronavirus vaccines: A Saudi nationwide study.

Abrar E Bukhari, Malak M Almutlq, Alhanouf A Bin Dakhil, Ghadah I Alhetheli, Sulaiman K Alfouzan, Mohammed A Alqahtani, Abdullah A Aljalfan, Mohammed A Almutawa, Fahad S Alsubaie, Abdulaziz N Madani

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatologic therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abrar E BukhariDepartment of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2257-4836
Malak M AlmutlqCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Alhanouf A Bin DakhilCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ghadah I AlhetheliDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Sulaiman K AlfouzanCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed A AlqahtaniCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah A AljalfanCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed A AlmutawaCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad S AlsubaieCollege of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz N MadaniDepartment of Dermatology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University · SAKing Saud University · SAQassim University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus vaccine was developed to help overcome the COVID-19 crisis. This study aimed to identify the cutaneous side effects secondary to Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines in the general population of Saudi Arabia and to list the risk factors for the development of cutaneous side effects. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2021, self-administered surveys were distributed electronically through social media, and telephonic interviews were conducted with a sample size of 1000 participants. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. A total of 1021 patients (229 male and 722 female) aged 12 years or older were included. While 833 participants were medically free, 188 had chronic illnesses. While 802 participants were not taking any medications, 219 were taking medications regularly. Oxford-Astra Zeneca and Pfizer BioNTech vaccines were administered to 319 and 702 participants, respectively. One-hundred and twenty-five participants previously had COVID-19 infection and 407 were exposed to a PCR positive case of COVID. Six hundred and fifty-nine patients (64.5%) reported experiencing injection site reactions: 606 (59.4%) had injection site pain, 168 (16.5%) had injection site swelling, and 107 (10.5%) had injection site redness. Only 51 patients (5%) experienced cutaneous side effects after injection. A significant association was found between chronic illnesses and cutaneous side effects post-vaccine (9% vs. 4.1%; p value = 0.005). Patients on medications showed a higher rate of symptoms (8.2% vs. 4.1%; p value = 0.005). Age, gender, vaccine types, and history of COVID-19 infection were not significantly associated with cutaneous side effects post-vaccine.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInjection Site ReactionMaleSARS-CoV-2Saudi ArabiaCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19cutaneous adverse reactionsinjection site reactionOxford Astra-ZenecaPfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2)

Identifiers

PMID35293657
PMCPMC9111380
OpenAlexW4220720307

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.