Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35296464›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2022

To call or not to call: exploring the validity of telephone interviews to derive maternal self-reports of experiences with facility childbirth care in northern Nigeria.

Nasir Umar, Joanna Schellenberg, Zelee Hill, Antoinette Alas Bhattacharya, Moise Muzigaba, Özge Tunçalp, Nuraddeen Umar Sambo, Abdulrahman Shuaibu, Tanya Marchant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nasir UmarDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK Nasir.Umar@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5119-0092
Joanna SchellenbergDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0708-3676
Zelee HillInstitute for Global Health, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Research, London, UK.
Antoinette Alas BhattacharyaDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5400-9383
Moise MuzigabaDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.
Özge TunçalpSexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organizations, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5370-682X
Nuraddeen Umar SamboData Research and Mapping Consult Limited, Abuja, FCT, Nigeria.
Abdulrahman ShuaibuExecutive Office, State Primary Health Care Development Agency, Gombe, Nigeria.
Tanya MarchantDepartment of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo institutionalise respectful maternity care, frequent data on the experience of childbirth care is needed by health facility staff and managers. Telephone interviews have been proposed as a low-cost alternative to derive timely and actionable maternal self-reports of experience of care. However, evidence on the validity of telephone interviews for this purpose is limited.

methodsEight indicators of positive maternity care experience and 18 indicators of negative maternity care experience were investigated. We compared the responses from exit interviews with women about their childbirth care experience (reference standard) to follow-up telephone interviews with the same women 14 months after childbirth. We calculated individual-level validity metrics including, agreement, sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). We compared the characteristics of women included in the telephone follow-up interviews to those from the exit interviews.

resultsDemographic characteristics were similar between the original exit interview group (n=388) and those subsequently reached for telephone interview (n=294). Seven of the eight positive maternity care experience indicators had reported prevalence higher than 50% at both exit and telephone interviews. For these indicators, agreement between the exit and the telephone interviews ranged between 50% and 92%; seven positive indicators met the criteria for validation analysis, but all had an AUC below 0.6. Reported prevalence for 15 of the 18 negative maternity care experience indicators was lower than 5% at exit and telephone interviews. For these 15 indicators, agreement between exit and telephone interview was high at over 80%. Just three negative indicators met the criteria for validation analysis, and all had an AUC below 0.6.

conclusionsThe telephone interviews conducted 14 months after childbirth did not yield results that were consistent with exit interviews conducted at the time of facility discharge. Women's reports of experience of childbirth care may be influenced by the location of reporting or changes in the recall of experiences of care over time.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesFemaleHumansNigeriaParturitionPregnancySelf ReportTelephoneepidemiologyhealth services researchmaternal healthpublic health

Identifiers

PMID35296464
PMCPMC8928249

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.