Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35296530›Full record

SynthesisRMD open2022

Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review.

Marie Binvignat, Valentina Pedoia, Atul J Butte, Karine Louati, David Klatzmann, Francis Berenbaum, Encarnita Mariotti-Ferrandiz, Jérémie Sellam

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in RMD open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Minimally Invasive Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marie BinvignatDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Inserm UMRS_938, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7473-7636
Valentina PedoiaCenter for Intelligent Imaging (CI2), Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Atul J ButteBakar Computational Health Science Institute, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Karine LouatiDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Inserm UMRS_938, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France.
David KlatzmannImmunology Immunopathology Immunotherapy UMRS_959, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France.
Francis BerenbaumDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Inserm UMRS_938, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8252-7815
Encarnita Mariotti-Ferrandiz *Immunology Immunopathology Immunotherapy UMRS_959, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France.
Jérémie Sellam *Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Inserm UMRS_938, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France jeremie.sellam@aphp.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this systematic literature review was to provide a comprehensive and exhaustive overview of the use of machine learning (ML) in the clinical care of osteoarthritis (OA).

methodsA systematic literature review was performed in July 2021 using MEDLINE PubMed with key words and MeSH terms. For each selected article, the number of patients, ML algorithms used, type of data analysed, validation methods and data availability were collected.

resultsFrom 1148 screened articles, 46 were selected and analysed; most were published after 2017. Twelve articles were related to diagnosis, 7 to prediction, 4 to phenotyping, 12 to severity and 11 to progression. The number of patients included ranged from 18 to 5749. Overall, 35% of the articles described the use of deep learning And 74% imaging analyses. A total of 85% of the articles involved knee OA and 15% hip OA. No study investigated hand OA. Most of the studies involved the same cohort, with data from the OA initiative described in 46% of the articles and the MOST and Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee cohorts in 11% and 7%. Data and source codes were described as publicly available respectively in 54% and 22% of the articles. External validation was provided in only 7% of the articles.

conclusionThis review proposes an up-to-date overview of ML approaches used in clinical OA research and will help to enhance its application in this field.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeHumansKnee JointMachine LearningArtificial IntelligenceMachine LearningOsteoarthritisSystemic Literature Review

Identifiers

PMID35296530
PMCPMC8928401

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.