Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35297026›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2022

Cost of Severe Hypoglycemia and Budget Impact with Nasal Glucagon in Patients with Diabetes in Spain.

Beatrice Osumili, Esther Artime, Beth Mitchell, Miriam Rubio-de Santos, Silvia Díaz-Cerezo, Marga Giménez, Erik Spaepen, Helen Sharland, William J Valentine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Managing Severe Hypoglycaemia in Patients with Diabetes: Current Challenges and Emerging Therapies.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Beatrice OsumiliEli Lilly and Company Limited, Bracknell, UK.
Esther ArtimeLilly España, Madrid, Spain.
Beth MitchellEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA.
Miriam Rubio-de SantosLilly España, Madrid, Spain.
Silvia Díaz-CerezoLilly España, Madrid, Spain.
Marga GiménezDiabetes Unit, Endocrinology and Nutrition Department, IMDM, Hospital Clínic i Universitari de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Erik SpaepenHaaPACS GmbH, Schriesheim, Germany.
Helen SharlandOssian Health Economics and Communications GmbH, Bäumleingasse 20, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.
William J ValentineOssian Health Economics and Communications GmbH, Bäumleingasse 20, 4051, Basel, Switzerland. valentine@ossianconsulting.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSevere hypoglycemic events (SHE) represent a clinical and economic burden in patients with diabetes. Nasal glucagon (NG) is a novel treatment for SHEs with similar efficacy, but with a usability advantage over injectable glucagon (IG) that may translate to improved economic outcomes. The economic implications of this usability advantage on SHE-related spending in Spain were explored in this analysis.

methodsA cost-offset and budget impact analysis (BIA) was conducted using a decision tree model, adapted for the Spanish setting. The model calculated average costs per SHE over the SHE treatment pathway following a treatment attempt with IG or NG. Analyses were performed separately in three populations with insulin-treated diabetes: children and adolescents (4-17 years) with type 1 diabetes (T1D), adults with T1D and adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), with respective population estimates applied in BIA. Treatment probabilities were assumed to be equal for IG and NG, except for treatment success following glucagon administration. Epidemiologic and cost data were obtained from Spanish-specific sources. BIA results were presented at a 3-year time horizon.

resultsOn a per SHE level, NG was associated with lower costs compared to IG (children and adolescents with T1D, EUR 820; adults with T1D, EUR 804; adults with T2D, EUR 725). Lower costs were attributed to reduced costs of professional medical assistance in patients treated with NG. After 3 years, BIA showed that relative to IG, the introduction of NG was projected to reduce SHE-related spending by EUR 1,158,969, EUR 142,162,371, and EUR 6,542,585 in children and adolescents with T1D, adults with T1D, and adults with insulin-treated T2D, respectively.

conclusionsIn Spain, the usability advantage of NG over IG translates to potential cost savings per SHE in three populations with insulin-treated diabetes, and the introduction of NG was associated with a lower budget impact versus IG in each group.

Indexed as

Budget impactCost-offsetDiabetes mellitusHealthcare costHealthcare resourceInjectable glucagonInsulinNasal glucagonSevere hypoglycemiaSpain

Identifiers

PMID35297026
PMCPMC8991229

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.