Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35300321›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference)2022

TAX-Corpus: Taxonomy based Annotations for Colonoscopy Evaluation.

Shorabuddin Syed, Adam Jackson Angel, Hafsa Bareen Syeda, Carole Franc Jennings, Joseph VanScoy, Mahanazuddin Syed, Melody Greer, Sudeepa Bhattacharyya, Shaymaa Al-Shukri, Meredith Zozus and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shorabuddin SyedDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-4761-5972
Adam Jackson AngelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Washington University, U.S.A.
Hafsa Bareen SyedaDepartment of Neurology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0001-9752-4983
Carole Franc JenningsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tulane University, U.S.A.
Joseph VanScoyCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, U.S.A.
Mahanazuddin SyedDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-8978-1565
Melody GreerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, U.S.A.
Sudeepa BhattacharyyaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University, U.S.A.
Shaymaa Al-ShukriDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, U.S.A.
Meredith ZozusDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Centre at San Antonio, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-9332-1684
Fred PriorDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-6314-5683
Benjamin TharianDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, U.S.A.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USArkansas State University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USTulane University · US

Funding

Expanding Translational Research in ArkansasUL1TR003107 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI JAMES, LAURA P · 2019 to 2023
$21.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonoscopy plays a critical role in screening of colorectal carcinomas (CC). Unfortunately, the data related to this procedure are stored in disparate documents, colonoscopy, pathology, and radiology reports respectively. The lack of integrated standardized documentation is impeding accurate reporting of quality metrics and clinical and translational research. Natural language processing (NLP) has been used as an alternative to manual data abstraction. Performance of Machine Learning (ML) based NLP solutions is heavily dependent on the accuracy of annotated corpora. Availability of large volume annotated corpora is limited due to data privacy laws and the cost and effort required. In addition, the manual annotation process is error-prone, making the lack of quality annotated corpora the largest bottleneck in deploying ML solutions. The objective of this study is to identify clinical entities critical to colonoscopy quality, and build a high-quality annotated corpus using domain specific taxonomies following standardized annotation guidelines. The annotated corpus can be used to train ML models for a variety of downstream tasks.

Indexed as

AnnotationClinical CorpusColonoscopyMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingTaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID35300321
PMCPMC8926426
OpenAlexW4214711736

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.