Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35302628›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2022

Association of Oncologist-Patient Communication With Functional Status and Physical Performance in Older Adults: A Secondary Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Marielle Jensen-Battaglia, Lianlian Lei, Huiwen Xu, Lee Kehoe, Amita Patil, Kah Poh Loh, Erika Ramsdale, Allison Magnuson, Amber S Kleckner, Tanya M Wildes and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02107443 (Improving Communication for Cancer Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02107443 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Communication for Cancer Treatment: Addressing Concerns of Older Cancer Patients and Caregivers

TypeinterventionalSponsorSupriya MohileRan2014 to 2020Enrolled546ConditionsAdult Solid Neoplasm, LymphomaArmsGeriatric Assessment Summary, Geriatric Assessment Targeted Recommendations, Geriatric Assessment (GA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Systemic Cancer Therapy: ASCO Guideline Update.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Marielle Jensen-BattagliaJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Lianlian LeiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Huiwen XuSealy Center on Aging, Department of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.
Lee KehoeJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Amita PatilJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kah Poh LohJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Erika RamsdaleJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Allison MagnusonJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Amber S KlecknerSchool of Nursing, Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, University of Maryland, Baltimore.
Tanya M WildesCancer and Aging Research Group, St Louis, Missouri.
Po-Ju LinJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Karen M MustianJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Gilbert GiriJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Mary WhiteheadSCOREboard Advisory Group, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
James BeardenUpstate Carolina National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Spartanburg, South Carolina.
Brian L BurnetteCancer Research of Wisconsin and Northern Michigan National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Green Bay.
Jodi GeerMetro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Program National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, St Louis Park.
Supriya G MohileJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Richard F DunneJames P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
University of Rochester Medical Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USJohns Hopkins University · USMetro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

URCC NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, KAREN M. MUSTIAN · 2014 to 2026
$67.7M
Clinical and Translational Cancer Control Research Training ProgramT32CA102618 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, Gary R Morrow · 2019 to 2026
$2.7M
A Patient-Oriented Research Program in Geriatric OncologyK24AG056589 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Supriya G. Mohile · 2018 to 2026
$1.5M
Mitigating Cancer-Related Cognitive Dysfunction in Older Adults with Breast CancerK76AG064394 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MAGNUSON, ALLISON MARIAN · 2019 to 2023
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA102618NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189961NIA NIH HHS K24 AG056589NIA NIH HHS K76 AG064394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The functional status and physical performance of older adults with cancer are underassessed and undertreated despite the high prevalence of impaired functional status and physical performance in this population and their associations with chemotherapy-induced toxic effects and mortality. Objective: To examine the association between providing oncologists with a geriatric assessment (GA) summary with recommendations and having oncologist-patient conversations about functional and physical performance. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data for this secondary analysis were collected from October 29, 2014, to April 28, 2017, for a national cluster randomized clinical trial conducted by the University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program evaluating the effect of a GA intervention on patient satisfaction with communication about aging-related concerns. There were 17 practice clusters in the intervention group and 14 in the usual care group. All 541 participants underwent a GA including standardized functional and physical performance measures and had 1 clinical encounter audio-recorded, transcribed, and blindly coded to categorize conversations by GA domain. Participants were aged 70 years or older, with a stage III or IV solid tumor or lymphoma with palliative treatment intent, and impairment in 1 or more GA domain. Statistical analysis was performed from August 18, 2020, to January 10, 2022. Interventions: Oncologist practices randomized to the intervention received a GA summary and validated recommendations for each patient prior to the audio-recorded clinical encounter. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary analysis of this clinical trial assessed the effect of the intervention on patient satisfaction with oncologist communication about aging-related concerns. This secondary analysis assessed the post hoc hypothesis that the intervention would be associated with an increase in the proportion of patients having conversations with their oncologists and receiving oncologist recommendations specific to functional and physical performance concerns. Results: A total of 541 patients (276 men [51%]; mean [SD] age, 77.5 [5.2] years [range, 70-96 years]) were analyzed at baseline. Excluding 13 patients without audio recordings, 86% of patients (95% CI, 78%-91%) in the intervention group vs 59% of patients (95% CI, 47%-69%; P < .001) receiving usual care had conversations about functional or physical performance. Conversations were more frequently initiated by oncologists in the intervention group (84%; 95% CI, 77%-90%) than oncologists in the usual care group (58%; 95% CI, 45%-70%; P < .001). Oncologists in the intervention group were more likely to address patients' concerns (43%; 95% CI, 33%-53%) than oncologists in the usual care group (17%; 95% CI, 10%-26%; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of a cluster randomized clinical trial, providing oncologists with a GA summary was associated with an increase in the number of oncologist-patient conversations about functional and physical performance-related concerns with recommendations to address these concerns. These findings support the use of the GA summary and recommendations as important tools in caring for older adults with advanced cancer and functional or physical impairments. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02107443.

Indexed as

Functional StatusOncologistsAgedCommunicationGeriatric AssessmentHumansMalePhysical Functional Performance

Identifiers

PMID35302628
PMCPMC8933739
OpenAlexW4220679468

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.