ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2022
Automatic detection of arrhythmias from an ECG signal using an auto-encoder and SVM classifier.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning for ECG Arrhythmia detection and classification: an overview of progress for period 2017-2023.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Pooled it
- Machine learning-enabled ECG arrhythmia classification: a systematic and educational study from signal processing to decision support.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Generalizable Hybrid Wavelet-Deep Learning Architecture for Robust Arrhythmia Detection in Wearable ECG Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Efficient Deep Learning-Based Arrhythmia Detection Using Smartwatch ECG Electrocardiograms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Micro- and Nano-Enhanced Intravascular Biosensors for Real-Time Monitoring, Early Disease Diagnosis, and Drug Therapy Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advances in cardiovascular signal analysis with future directions: a review of machine learning and deep learning models for cardiovascular disease classification based on ECG, PCG, and PPG signals.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
- Advancing cardiac diagnostics: high-accuracy arrhythmia classification with the EGOLF-net model.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- A Novel Instruction Driven 1-D CNN Processor for ECG Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Future Horizons: The Potential Role of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Millions of people around the world are affected by arrhythmias, which are abnormal activities of the functioning of the heart. Most arrhythmias are harmful to the heart and can suddenly become life-threatening. The electrocardiogram (ECG) is an important non-invasive tool in cardiology for the diagnosis of arrhythmias. This work proposes a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to automatically classify different types of arrhythmias from ECG signals. First, the auto-encoder convolutional network (ACN) model is used, which is based on a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) that automatically learns the best features from the raw ECG signals. After that, the support vector machine (SVM) classifier is applied to the features learned by the ACN model to improve the detection of arrhythmic beats. This classifier detects four different types of arrhythmias, namely the left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), paced beat (PB), and premature ventricular contractions (PVC), along with the normal sinus rhythms (NSR). Among these arrhythmias, PVC is particularly a dangerous type of heartbeat in ECG signals. The performance of the model is measured in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and precision using a tenfold cross-validation strategy on the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. The obtained overall accuracy of the SVM classifier was 98.84%. The result of this model is portrayed as a better performance than in other literary works. Thus, this approach may also help in further clinical studies of cardiac cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.