Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35305334›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Neurology2022

Research priorities to improve stroke outcomes.

Georgina Hill, Sandra Regan, Richard Francis, Stroke Priority Setting Partnership Steering Group

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review and in silico analysis of studies investigating the ischemic penumbra proteome in animal models of experimental stroke.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Frailty and Cardiovascular Risk.European cardiology · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Frailty and stroke: Global implications for assessment, research, and clinical care-A WSO scientific statement.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Georgina HillStroke Association, London, EC1V 2PR, UK.
Sandra ReganStroke Association, London, EC1V 2PR, UK.
Richard FrancisStroke Association, London, EC1V 2PR, UK. Electronic address: richard.francis@stroke.org.uk.
Stroke Priority Setting Partnership Steering Group

Funding

British Heart Foundation CS/18/2/33719British Heart Foundation FS/13/72/30531British Heart Foundation FS/17/53/33119British Heart Foundation PG/14/50/30891British Heart Foundation SP/12/2/29422Chief Scientist Office CZG/2/265Medical Research Council G1002605Medical Research Council G108/613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansResearch

Identifiers

PMID35305334
PMCPMC8926410

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.